AI is worthless if you are unable to tell hallucination from fact.

But just like NP hard problems, verifying a given solution is much easier than coming up with one yourself.

I’ve had up to 9.5 hour days at school (7:50am - 5:20 pm). Only at most twice a week though, on other days school ended at 1 pm.

This also includes 2 hours of breaks along the day by way.

Goddammit why do you English speaking people keep dropping letters from words you borrowed. Don’t you know it’s rude to break things someone lent you?

https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/charme

You can legally discriminate against size though.

If you’re in the top 1 percentile of sizes, any and all clothes will be much more expensive than if you were in the median.

Please no.

The current UI is bad but it has charme. I like the inconsistency as more and more design tweaks piled on.

Any redesign risks keeping the UI bad but only removing the charme.

What does that even mean?

My comment argues that claiming antisemitism includes discrimination against anyone who is a semite has zero historical basis. It would also now exclude many Jews who are not semites yet were targeted by the Anti-Semites.

Of course genocide is bad. But anyone arguing Palestinians should be genocided because they are all “antisemites” will never be convinced by arguments. Therefore, there is no point in attempting to adjust the definition of antisemitism.

Antisemitism is defined by hatred of Jews, as coined by the German group Anti-Semites who wanted to have a fancier name than Jew-Haters.

It doesn’t really matter for anything that Palestinians are akshually semites.

It’s like arguing that racism is not a thing because technically human races do not exist outside pseudoscientific eugenics.

But it’s an OS requirement for infinite power!

OP can only have finite power without BSD.

Everyone needs a router with BSD, how else can you set up an overly complex home network??? Obviously every network needs an Intrusion Detection System and an Intrusion Prevention System.

Where BSD?

Only a fascist supports nazi regimes such as Hungary. Thank you for outing yourself.

A photographer without a camera cannot produce art though. They can imagine it, explain it and even make a rough sketch - but the end result isn’t art. It’s a concept for art that is not yet made reality.

Similarly, there are differing levels of effort in order to create AI art. For instance, someone using an LLM to create an AI picture has approximately as much artistic merit as someone using their phone to take a selfie. It requires roughly the same amount of effort as well.

But for other AI art, it can take a lot of time to get everything right. I’ve dabbled with Stable Diffusion two years ago and there is a lot of finetuning and parameters you had to set to get anything worthwhile. My attempts roughly looked like taking a photo with random brightness, contrast and exposure settings: like utter trash. With some time and practice one could likely get adept at manipulating whatever model one is using and generate plenty of images with purpose.

Most AI generated images have little to no artistic merit, just like most pictures taken with a smartphone camera. But you cannot conclude that any and all art with either of those tools is therefore impossible.

To arrive at a mutual consensus. That’s what the point of voting has always been.

Suspending a malicious actor’s voting rights does not violate this. In fact, it is required to do so. See the paradox of tolerance which goes into some more detail.

It does not, considering the suspension of voting rights is a process every member has agreed to existing.

A member state who goes rogue, who acts in the interest of foreign nations and not in the interest of the collective can, should and must have its voting rights suspended. The protection and continued existence of the union takes precedence over any individual nation’s voting rights.

There is no contradiction here. Suspending voting rights exists explicitly because there is no right to vote for whatever you want.

having the ability to create art from scratch is what makes someone an artist

This implies photographers aren’t artists though. They rely on a specific tool - the camera - and utilize it to create art. This ranges from “just” taking pictures to setting up elaborate scenes.

Another example - for which I have forgotten the name - is art utilizing computers. Not in the sense of anything digital but rather electronic calculating machines built to beep, boop and blink. I’ve been to an exhibition which featured this type of art by one artist. Some were interactive, some weren’t, some were (partially) broken after decades of age and some were still functioning. Most were built during the 60s to 90s by the way. I believe the artist never did created any other art, at least publicly. He was an artist nonetheless.

I’d say AI art is art. Any definition of artistry which attempts to exclude AI art must also exclude other unconventional art forms.

The question shouldn’t be what art is or isn’t anyways. Such questions often lead to gatekeeping or nazis. Rather, it should be about the meaning of art. And most of AI art has the sole meaning of looking decent. AI art cannot ever replace more meaningful art as it alone lacks much meaning. It may at most supplement it, with some artists perhaps using AI deliberately as part of a work.

Then that is also the reply to your question.

Or -1/12 if we take the limit as n approaches infinity!

Es gibt einen klaren Unterschied zwischen Nichtwissen und der nicht vorhandenen Widerlegung einer Behauptung.

Niemand kann Letzten-Donnerstag-ismus widerlegen - also der satirische Glaube, das Universum wäre letzten Donnerstag entstanden. Alle Erinnerungen und alle menschliche Geschichte seien explizit so erschaffen worden, um alles älter aussehen zu lassen.

Trotzdem gibt es sehr wenige Agnostiker, die sich hier auf “Nichtwissen” berufen und daher keine Aussage machen können.

Warum soll es mit einem Gott anders sein? Nur weil der Glaube an höhere Mächte etablierter ist, ist dieser nicht seriöser als unwiderlegbare Satiretheorien.

Prinzipiell weiß ich nicht mal, ob ich überhaupt existiere. “Ich denke, also bin ich”? Woher weiß man, dass man denkt?

Die Frage, ob ein Gott existiert ist genauso unnütz und es hat keinen Sinn, darüber nachzudenken, es sei denn man studiert Philosophie.

It assumes the man is being imprisoned for just cause

Guantanamo Bay doesn’t rely on any cause though? It’s literally a US torture camp where nothing matters. No due process, no just cause, no nothing. It’s worse than CECOT in everything but scale.

Have you ever seen any country’s opposition figure successfully demand something from another country? I personally haven’t. Usually the government alone controls any and all foreign relations.

Hell, Israel has literally detained and deported two British MPs on a parliamentary delegation - not just a visit. And they’re part of the governing party, no less!

It’s genuinely not surprising that El Salvador reacts this way. It’s the literal default reaction to a nongovernmental politician demanding something.

And yes, I think it’s appalling that the I US deports anyone and everyone, legally or otherwise. This doesn’t affect El Salvador though since they detain whoever the US sends there. The US argues this man is a terrorist, therefore this is sufficient justification for them.

Had Britain started deporting migrants to Rwanda and a MP from the Green Party requested to visit someone “mistakenly” deported, they would’ve been denied access as well.

I just really don’t think there’s anything noteworthy in the rejection alone.

“Right to work” legislation exists in other countries with strong unions.

For example, in Germany you cannot be compelled to join or to leave a union which makes “right to work” the default nationwide. Forcing people to join unions they do not want to be part of violates their freedom of contract. For similar reasons, employers cannot ban employees from talking about their wage, from having relationships or demand they sign “non-compete agreements” . The freedom of contract is constitutionally protected and cannot be waived just like that, even if all parties were to agree.

Yet unions are significantly stronger here than in the US.

Potato potato

Why is it called the Unicode Emoticons Block when it only includes emojis? Checkmate atheist!