For some reason, that doesn’t look like a GPT-generated graph, which means… sadly… that someone had to make that thing… and somebody had to approve it.
- 140 Posts
- 1.6K Comments
xiato Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•'Read' and its past tense are spelled the same. How should they be spelled?English5·17 hours agoHow about we go with reed and red… see, you already know how to pronounce them!
“Elemeno” reminds me of the decabet skit.
When you cant remember all of your many wives’ names you label them like the seven dwarves.
xiato cats@lemmy.world•I'm not sure if it's intentional, but all I see in this hotel bathroom wallpaper is stacked catsEnglish4·1 day agoAre those… magneto helmets?
xiaOPMtomicro-blog-[ish]•It looks like you haven't used Firefox in a while, would you like to UNDO all of your meticulous setup and custom configuration with a single press of this button?English5·3 days agoI actually did start down that road, but found it was just a different set of configuration things (enabling canvas, installing plugins with funky configuration steps to allow sites to see my timezone, etc).
xiatoHacker News@lemmy.bestiver.se•Why is your open source project still hosted on GitHub?English1·3 days agoInertia
xiato Reaction Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Regret / overwhelmed / why did my eyes see that?!? [monsterdon]English2·5 days agoWhen you forgot to wear safety goggles.
It’s probably to detect captive portals, which “look” like the internet, but are not.
Frequencies.
xiato Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•Not taking a risk is a risk. That's how I see it.English2·6 days agoIt’s not safe to feel safe.
Well, I do have MBSE on the brain, but the idea here is more like a low-code/no-code environment with an ABSOLUTELY ENORMOUS “pit of success”… so large that even GenAI can reliably fall into it. Numbered tabs, you go left to right answering questions and fiddling with with prompts, paint-by-numbers for working software.
I imagine that it is theoretically possible to successfully vibe-code, but probably not with a conventional project layout nor would it look much like traditional programming. Something like your interaction primarily being a “requirements list”, which gets translated into interfaces and heavy requirements tests against those interfaces, and each implementation file being disposable (regenerated) & super-self-contained, and only being able to “save” (or commit) implementations that pass the tests.
…and if you are building a webapp, it would not be able to touch the API layer except through operational transforms (which trigger new [major] version numbers]. Sorta like MCP.
Said another way, if we could make it more like a “ratchet” incrementing, and less like an out-of-control aircraft… then maybe?!?
xiato The Onion@midwest.social•Trump vows to jail anyone who says he’s against free speechEnglish9·7 days ago“Spoiled Onions” sounds like a cool sublemmy name…
🤖Humans require ice-cream🤖
xiato Daystrom Institute@startrek.website•How does someone get a splinter on a starship?English7·7 days agoYes, I imagine metal and glass splinters would happen, but we routinely get hair-splinters (something about how a sock holds it, skin flexes, and body weight). So yeah, sounds plausible to me even with so little as “wearing socks”.
I guess that makes it doubly-hidden… you add a hidden setting to the hidden settings behind the scary warning sign.