Rephrasing a common quote - talk is cheap, that’s why I talk a lot.

  • 0 Posts
  • 1.12K Comments
Joined 2 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年7月9日

help-circle
  • It made very different people millionaires and billionaires. Some local businessmen (a very American type in stereotypes, something between a conman and a normal mom and pop business owner), some professors with good understanding of mathematics involved, some translators for big people, some red directors who converted their Soviet power into new power.

    And in my childhood I thought they are all thieves, my worldview is more nuanced now. Life is complex.

    People talk of KGB as of the main important target of all potential lustrations in the future, but Eugene Kaspersky is KGB, and of people meaningful in Russia he’s honestly very fine. Some people talk of Yeltsin as someone good, but he was a Politburo member. People who remember general Lebed sometimes think he was killed because he was an honest patriotic politician, and he surely made the impression with that simple Soviet flat with a rug on the wall, that Siberian manner of speech, those pacifist and humanist things he would say in interviews (he managed to say without accusations and conflict that people who are mafia or terrorists or both for one government are friends for another and this is business as usual ; he also managed to say without losing any dignity or surrendering any important point that Russians can’t fight more wars after the XX century and that people fight to live in peace, these seem pretty obvious, but some obvious things don’t sound good on TV), except when he was made governor of his part of the world, he quickly became, eh, a normal governor - with new realty and a lover in Moscow, with very expensive idiotic PR actions (like that campaign with Alain Delon in the middle of a depressive Soviet junkyard with a Lenin statue endorsing Lebed), and so on, somehow the memory of him omits those few last years of his life, before the helicopter crash.

    Now when I think about it, I didn’t think they are all thieves, I knew life is complex and that I don’t personally know all these people.

    So - American billionaires don’t want to be trillionaires, I think. They want to be princes. Perhaps patricians. Or maybe mandarins. The issue is that they are blind to how all three things existed, using them as labels for their own dream of power over humans without complications. Princes were subject to God, Pope and their suzerain, multiple such sometimes, like in Brittany or Holsten or … Patricians obeyed the customs of their republic, whose first citizen usually was a plebeian - the man who was first named “first citizen” notably was, and his cognomen is now used to refer to emperors. Mandarins lived in the kingdom where the only unbreakable law was the mandate of heaven, and weren’t considered better people - certainly no more than as far as their emperor had it.

    I believe we will endure. I don’t know about the USA, but maybe it’s for the best that this project goes to version 2.0 .


  • Russia is 1) not that powerful by far, 2) its elites, those very ones spoken about when expressing these conspiracy theories, are pissing hot water from a mere hint of being friends with any US administration.

    They have sort of an inferiority complex, there was recently a damned TV report, apparently, about an American diplomat visiting a cafe and ordering a cheburek (Central Asian street food). It’s so much bootlicking that one can confidently say Russia’s elites are much bigger US fans than Russians in average.

    They might be unintentionally making the effect you described upon the US, while trying to somehow become part of its processes, but it’s a small nudge compared to the more serious reasons.

    I think this is because the people who are now Russia’s elite came to power in the 90s, a lot of ex-Soviet people looked at the situation pretty simply - as in “we were the losing superpower in this cold war thing, now it’s ended and we are friends, so we are going to become like America in those movies with white middle class people all owning cars and houses”, and those of them who were doing politics, apparently, wanted to have their own political system as “cool” (or whatever, some immeasurable feeling) as the American one.

    The Iron Curtain was a huge mistake, people who put it in place were thinking in 30s categories when the 30s were long gone. People inside thought that they only put barriers before you to protect something you’d want to have. A generation of Soviet people grew with that feeling, where everything Soviet was boring and bad, and everything Western magical and good. It wasn’t even about freedom or morality. Just about “coolness”. People breaking the USSR in the 80s and 90s knew that the world around it isn’t virtuous and kind, but they thought it’s “cooler”. Everyone thinks they’d do well when put into an adventure, when safe. Nobody thinks they’ll be some guy who gets eaten by a crocodile on the second page, or a coward, or an idiot, or a sucker.

    So. When the Russian “wide mass” realized that for the West it consists of suckers and crocodile fodder, it became disillusioned and the wound healed, except for some rare idiots who kept believing into that picture, not being exposed to reality.

    When the Russian elites realized that, they just decided to lower the bar, and be content with playing US sometimes, and getting US citizenship for themselves and their children, and being there often, and playing with US politics. I don’t think it’s directed at somehow corrupting and undoing the US, simply not enough power. They are just regularly touching in the shop something they can’t afford to buy.


  • He bankrupted a casino, he knows what he’s doing.

    I suppose that’s why the people paying for his campaign chose him, to bankrupt a nation you need someone this talented.

    Why do they need said nation bankrupt I don’t know, maybe to make it fail while the failure will still be not too gigantic to recover from, and maybe for yet another pump-and-dump scheme, except this time with a country and not an industry. Depends on how optimistic you are about their motives.


  • In ex-USSR that happened as something destructive, but in USA honestly it’s normal, using institutional pressure to help friendly businesses. Trump is unusual only in how grotesque he is in his position, but history saw Talleyrand.

    And US sanctioned Japan just because some of its businesses couldn’t compete, which didn’t kill Japanese car industry, but hurt Japanese computer industry, and sent Japan into recession from which it didn’t quite recover.

    About driving users off - that doesn’t really happen unless you intentionally break everything. VKontakte be the experiment showing this, except TG was later made based on VK makers’ experience with social stuff, and was very successful, and is now basically the most convenient messaging\social platform. When something FOSS manages to reproduce the experience of TG, then FOSS messaging and social systems stand a chance. So - some of the life moved from VK to TG, but it’s more of VK’s experience stagnating and being too complex and overloading, not of people fleeing it.




  • The idea, I think, is that the US with the Internet and, as a little part of it, Thiel’s company, is analogous to Sauron.

    And us all around, who think it’s a common medium everyone can use to all-human good, are analogous to Denethor or at least Saruman.

    And also American conservatives are weird, despite everyone trying to explain them they are monkeys, they tend to look for some “white culture” in Europe and in Tolkien’s writing not in the least.

    What matters is that, the same way as evolution or even their ML-based latest toy, societies react to poison. You don’t have to direct the reaction or to muster resources for it. The best way it happens is by them fulfilling their plan to its full possible extent and then seeing that they are out of potential, and their adversity is now immune.

    It’s like with warfare, smarts and discipline, resilience and maneuver, sophistication and simplicity, - these all are good or bad in their fitting places, there’s no rule than one is better than the other ever. In our world the worst a hypothetical adversary to the USA could do is to make an antidote. This poison is not deadly and building immunity is the best way at approaching it.



  • New frontier, my sweaty arse.

    I was reading about helium-3 mining in the same magazine for children where I was reading about “The Mummy” filming process, genetically modified small tigers as pets in the future, reconfigurable clothes made of nanobots, aliens and Median state.

    Or maybe in a bit different one, both were cool, one was more “popular science” minded, another was yellowish, but entertaining. The former was called “Young erudite”, the latter “Miracles and mysteries of the planet Earth”. Honestly I think I’m going to look them up, if they are still printed. Perhaps get a subscription.

    EDIT: Forgot to say the latter magazine for kids had its last issue released in year 2010. Which was the point of my comment, nothing new in talking about mining helium-3.


  • While I would prefer both Discord and Telegram to have alternatives, they are popular for a reason. They are in experience what the Internet was in the 00s to the people actually using it a lot.

    There are bigger platforms, which drive engagement and collect data as their business model, and they are convenient for everyone making decisions, except they don’t solve any problems too well. Like a casino. It doesn’t lead to anything good, but it’s entertainment in itself.

    TG and Discord are good at solving problems. They are Internet communication optimized - subscribe to a channel (or in Discord join a server, TG too has subchannels now, making a channel with subchannels similar to Discord) and say what you want to say, and read what you want to read.

    Needless to say that this is pretty similar to IRC of old, and a reiteration of IRC with less load on servers, better security, structured messages, file transfers … would perhaps be nicer, but a business model should be devised for such.


  • USA is a private surveillance state.

    Goes well with being a private apartheid state (“it’s not us, it’s just zoning laws and municipal control over development and a little bit of preference for demolishing black districts for transport development, and some deurbanization seasoning, and public railroad transport defunding topping”, as a result white middle class racists can live as usual never having to make obvious racist choices ; as a result they also think the world is like their fucking big village).

    Or private fascist propaganda out of every corner.

    Notably private censorship turned out to be a solvable task, takes an American to make that.


  • Let’s please remember the particular American academic culture. It looks funny and very attractive when shown in Indiana Jones movies or something like that, with a rosy flavor. But IRL plenty of people important in that and, well, directing the development of said culture are power-tripping rockstar-feeling idiots. If you compare American professors to German professors, you might see an ocean of cultural difference.

    People who make up said power are the very ones undoing it.

    The US doesn’t make anything and a lot of what it does make is bullshit like the entire corn industry. Much of the “value” in the US is speculative and, for lack of a better way of putting it, a complete and utter fantasy. As soon as that house of cards starts to become unstable and the world moves away from the USD then the US economy is going to implode so hard that it would make a black hole blush.

    That’s just the latter part of any cycle of life and power. You conquer reputation and eventually you start using it to reinforce the actual value, and that leads to increasing degradation.


  • They need.

    We (as me + unidentified crowd of people) need cryptographically ensured identity of our counterparts and contents of their messages. We don’t need nice (“responsible”) bots.

    But then, about cryptography, we also need to learn one other thing - everything can be hidden in the open, and randomly taken FOSS developers are not our friends, especially when working for DARPA-funded, corporate-funded, Chinese government-funded and other such projects.

    This means that a good system should involve distrust not only in cryptography implementations, but also protocols, schemes and algorithms. The only common thing in such a system would be its structure of data. I personally want that to be entities linked to entities without hierarchical paths, and tagged. Like some unholy mix between a non-hierarchical linked filesystem and Twitter. Then there can be smart contracts and deltas and such, to allow editing posts, delegating rights in groups and such.

    All cryptographic verification and data exchange shouldn’t specify protocols and algorithms, that should be tag content. A checksum tag consists of “merst-3791:1234566789008”, where MERST stands for “Middle-Earth royal standards tower”, or with some other first part (the algorithm) and the second part (the value). Similar with signature tags and public key tags and what not.

    A post identity being the checksum means that if you, when receiving a post archive from your friend on a USB stick, verify it successfully, then the post is valid, otherwise not. Might also have a different checksum for that plus tags.

    You might use something else for exchange of updates. Just that something should be pluralistic.

    When the data structure is the only thing defining the common system, you can have all kinds of interoperability, similar to early e-mail traveling via Internet and UUCP and Fidonet and AppleTalk networks, using e-mail gateways and virtuously set up mail servers. Because in e-mail there’s a message and there are addresses\identifiers of its authors and addressees. It was designed when the frog was less boiled than now. It’s gateway-friendly architecturally. Made very long ago, as one of the oldest kinds of applications, less touched by strategic interests.

    The Internet and the Web being a monoculture mean that there are probably a few backdoors intentionally put in the open and stored by American special services till a better time to use, in popular TCP/IP stacks, in operating systems, in browsers, in TLS protocols, in common encryption algorithms, everywhere.

    Also notice how the “impartial and principled” famous people like Bruce Schneier love that “don’t roll out your own crypto” rule. It’s correct when it’s formulated as “everyone can devise a cipher they themselves can’t break”. But that’s not what the popular message says, an d wording is important, it’s both the message that says “trust me and don’t try” and the emotion that says “if you trust me, you can’t be deceived”. And people who think they can’t be deceived are fucked in everything they do.

    I attribute to this tendency also the situation with cybersecurity, where in the 00s lots of things worked over unencrypted connections, and that was normal, but at the same time computer crime was far less harmful than now. Because people back then knew they are not safe, casually encountering situations teaching them of that. People now think they are safe, while most of their communications are just as secured as in 00s, only the balance is different - they are protected firmly from their neighbor, but naked before Zuck, Brin, American special services, and anyone who could put a backdoor in the open. Before much of the Silicon Valley, one can say. And people who think they are safe do all kinds of stupid things.

    Getting back to the “don’t roll out your own” mantra, Soviet computer industry would probably work better if they did the opposite and made a ban on copying Western designs. And Soviet computer industry was the main thing that could have saved the USSR itself.

    And don’t tell me how US had better education and bigger resources and so on, Buran was expensive, but better than anything US built to that moment, but most of the expenses were not due to ambition, but due to inefficiencies in planning, as in money going into sand - agricultural produce rotting, while being in demand someplace else, expensive things used for bullshit purposes and cheap things used for important purposes, lots of some produce laying stored someplace in enormous numbers while needed elsewhere, building a few models of tanks with all components incompatible, but functionally equivalent, and so on.

    In general, “don’t roll out your own” seems to be the American message to the rest of the world, and those who follow it are abused. Seems to be a clear enough pattern to learn from.

    And there’s another, the “given enough eyeballs all bugs are shallow” line. It’s like saying that given enough people in the town all streets are safe. “Enough” is not the amount we can realistically reach even with Linux. There are not enough eyeballs. There are backdoors in the open which nobody looks at for long enough to find them. And this is too a false safety feeling factor, people believe FOSS software to be far safer than proprietary software, while in fact it’s just a bit safer, and considering that psychological factor, it might well be more dangerous.

    Openness and collaboration are good when treated correctly, it’s just that they are not. “Smarter people did all this before you, and you are being luddite for willing to replace their work” is not a good approach, yet it’s communicates from all corners, by corporate and FOSS people alike. Meaning that, sorry, most of FOSS is contaminated.

    Oof, I wrote a rant.



  • Ah, yes. It sucks when such bottlenecks are legally enforced.

    I mean, in case of the USA it’s a clear legacy of racism, not just zoning laws, but also laws made to make spontaneous (I don’t mean squatting and undocumented slums by that, just populated areas growing more naturally) development hard. Also how trains are perceived, it seems, there.

    Say, if I can bear 2+hr long commute (would be like 1.2hr on the train, 0.8hr on the subway, and some waiting and walking in between) in case I need something in Moscow, buying a crumbling house in a literal village (with a train station nearby) is the cheapest thing (but not cheap) one can do. It’s just - with such a property you need to think, because if you run out of firewood or diesel or whatever you use, you may literally freeze (or at least crush the pipes). You also need to fix stuff yourself. And you need to get to know your neighbors and be on good terms with them.


  • and have terrible resolution

    Now-now. With CRTs resolution is not an inherent trait anyway. You could trade off update frequency for better resolution and back.

    They’re heavy, waste tons of space, guzzle power,

    When CRTs were common, LCD displays also were heavy, wasted tons of space and guzzled power. And for some time after that they were crap for your eyes.

    Even the best CRT ever made is absolutely destroyed by the worst of modern LCDs.

    No, the best CRT ever made is really not that, but also costs like an airplane’s wing.

    Well, that and the resolution was so garbage they had a natural form of antialiasing, but that’s a really optimistic way of saying they were blurry as shit.

    An LCD display has resolution as its trait. A CRT display has a range of resolutions realistically usable with it. It doesn’t have a matrix of pixels, only a surface at which particles are shot.

    So, the point before I forget it. While CRTs as they existed are a thing of the past, it would be cool to have some sort of optical displays based on interference (suppose, two lasers at the sides of the screen) or whatever, allowing similarly agile resolution change, and also more energy-efficient than LCDs, and also better for one’s eyes. I think there even are some, just very expensive. Removing the “one bad pixel” component would do wonders. Also this could probably be a better technology for foldable displays. As in - now you scratch a screen, you have to replace the matrix. While such a component wouldn’t cost as much a whole matrix, the lasers would be the expensive part.

    Anyway, just dreaming.





  • Funny to read as someone from a country where having a vehicle is far more expensive than having a place to live.

    Anyway. I suppose if one can afford transportation (have a vehicle and can afford gasoline), then homesteading\buying a piece of land really far away from good places, making a basic living box on small foundation, with orgalite, polycarbonate and some heat isolation, and vinyl siding, a well (the hardest part) and a potbelly stove for heating, with lots of aspen around (really doesn’t take effort to grow LOL) to have firewood, and a place to grow potatoes (maybe a greenhouse to grow something nicer), - can be more affordable than “normal” housing. While you are making the thing, you don’t even have to live there.

    I mean, OK, it’s stupid.