How do you prevent people from selling access to children by calling the age verification service for them?

Btw,

Do you really have no other complaints?

Which other complaints could I have?

from here:

https://www.project2025.observer/

How can it be done?

Mach mehr Kinder, so dass Rentner irrelevant werden.

Russland will keine Natotruppen in der Ukraine. England hat Reassurance Truppen organisiert, die bei einem Waffenstillstand in der Ukraine stationiert werden.

Russland wird unter diesen Bedingungen keinen Waffenstillstand beginnen.

If it is about protecting children, just create age based VPNs and whitelist the services with appropriate content.

This must be used above all to track the activity of every adult among all popular services. Having to proof adultness cannot be done without creating a link between the identify of the adult and the account at the service.

In theory, it’s possible, if the age verification authority keeps the link secret. But that’s impossible to uphold.

What are the elites planning to do that requires this huge amount of surveillance? The article says that they need it already in the second quarter of 2025. We will find out soon.

Dann aber bitte eine Einkommens- und Vermögens-abhängige Steuer, so dass sie nicht nur den armen ‘hilft’.

Dann noch Alkoholabgabe am besten nur mit elektronischer Bezahlung. Dann kann man auch Suchtberatungsgespräche gezielt anbieten.

Das eigentliche Problem ist aber, dass wir Sucht nicht wirklich therapieren können. Wenn das folgende Experiment echt war, sollten wir uns besser darauf konzentrieren, die Gesellschaft zu verbessern.

https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rat_Park

Ja, nur aus welchem Grund ist China auf Russlands Seite?

Gibts schon die Meinung einer Frau dazu?

For whatever reason I feel like Musk is waking up to the fact that people really reject his policies. If he is one of the masterminds that could mean that things change.

But it’s more likely that those losses in sales were accepted sacrifices.

And yet, I cannot imagine that things can significantly get worse. The media and economy is controlled, the chat messages can be intercepted. What else could an authoritarian regime want? Why remove the illusion that people are free?

I rather think that the actions taken are just there to make the rightwing voters think that something is done. But their situation cannot improve. But there is also not much more chaos that can be created beyond cripling US producation capacities.

This only leaves bold foreign policy options. My guess would be that it’s time for the Iran invasion.

If it’s actually about creating authoritarianism then the next step is militarising the population. Create a ‘work force’ and have all unemployed people do manual communal work in groups. Also create a civil leader for every block or street.

The elves are better humans, ubermenschen if you want. It makes even more sense.

To me, it seems that trauma is an essential tool to build our civilization. Trauma allows people to identify with trauma in other people, or situations in general. People without trauma see other people suffering and feel bad for them, but they cannot identify with them.

This is important for civilization because the processes of society have to be understood and sometimes have to be healed which requires that some people can identify with the problems.

So to have civilization, there needs to be a constant stream of trauma to have enough people who can show the problems so that we can fix the problems of society.

It’s a bit circular that there are problems to fix problems.

Is it evil to cause that system of trauma? That depends on the answer of is it good to have civilization?

If you want to open source it you can already open source your documents.

You can publish them and see if others like the idea and join you.

Maybe create a lemmy community to organize people who want to join.

It is. Thanks for sharing.

How close would that be to slavery?

Is there something special about the bust?

I am sorry to tell you but if I didn’t know better, this exchange would have made me question the critics of the AfD and start seeing the AfD as the choice of reason.

You say there are lies but you just offer a strawman argument in the form of a sack of potatoes. If you don’t back up these claims I usually conclude that they are wrong.

You don’t have to convince me that the AfD is ineligible. I am with you. But you can’t claim that the AfD makes up causes and you make up your own. That makes all your claims unbelievable.

Sorry for not noticing.

Thanks, I would have looked differently at your comment if you had directly added that source.

it’s very likley

Then it is still not a quote.

In general, if somebody can proof something easily but does not, then I assume that it is wrong. If others think like me, you create the opposite message of what you want.

immerhin sind die Leute durch diesen bullshit so abgelenkt, dass wir uns jetzt endlich wieder in die Vergangenheit zurück reagieren lassen können

Die AfD ist die Alternative, aber da rassistisch, nicht mehrheitsfähig. Damit können die etablierten Parteien auf Jahre Politik gegen die Mehrheit machen, da nicht noch eine Opposition entstehen wird. Das könnte Zufall sein. Die Medien haben aber die AfD durch auffällig viel Aufmerksamkeit bereits in der Anfangsphase gross gemacht. Daher halte ich die rechte Gefahr für gewollte politische Ablenkung.