• 0 Posts
  • 11 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 16th, 2025

help-circle



  • I don’t understand what the point of this business is, except to grift off the aggrieved rich failsons unable to handle the horribly difficult work of hiring a PR firm to smear the people they’re mad at. At first i thought that it could be to create a formal ‘social credit score’ for journalists and integrate it directly with different publications to quantify how mad the ruling class is with a given individual, in order to discredit them or bar them from work or chill their speech, as D’Souza implies here:

    One of my final questions for D’Souza — who told me he’d been in a slew of talks with media owners about his venture (“I’m coming to New York next week to meet all the big guys”)

    but that sort of thing happens already. Nobody who seriously challenges power is getting hired at The New York Times or The Washington Post. That’s just a top down directive from the owners. What is the point of this? it’s staggeringly stupid. Just shit talk these people in your private Signal GCs, guys. Andreessen and David Sacks and Karp will be happy to help you compose a peevish Xeet or a lawsuit. stop being weird losers.

    Special mentions:

    Then, of course, there are billionaires and their heirs. D’Souza believes that “many journalists are more powerful than billionaires,” explaining, “I can’t tell you how many billionaires and CEOs have called me in absolute tears about their lives being destroyed by one article.”

    god, journalism would be so much cooler if it could directly remove money from the accounts of the Idiot Rich. Alas.

    “It’s only the top 1 percent who matter. These are the people who are going to be the value creators” when, in his view, AI soon completely transforms just about every aspect of economic life.

    🫩




  • really remarkable how they just expect us to swallow the hard pivot from “AI is going to take all your jobs and render your economic value to the amount of calories harvestable from your feeble body” to “AI will create undecillion jobs UwU (◠‿◠✿)”

    Another quick sneer:

    Cherny: I was so focused on shipping. As soon as I got the idea, I spent every night and every weekend on it — it was the only thing I thought about, the only thing I worked on. I started having dreams about Claude Code, and that’s still all I dream about: what should we do next, what do we build next. There’s a chance now to zoom out, because a lot of people are using it and there’s a lot to learn about how. But for a long time we were so focused on building that I didn’t even have a chance to think about what it was.

    Emphasis mine. the ideology buried within statements like this makes me want to erase the idea of a computer from the collective human consciousness. I feel like moving to the woods with some goats, or something, when i consider the fact that literally every single one of the tech oligarchs thinks like this. Literally channeling the spirit of capitalism like your body is a portal to a lovecraftian dimension. Purge. purge. purge this evil



  • this feels like a form of critihype but i haven’t read anything else by this person so i don’t know. Examples:

    Artificial intelligence is entering public consciousness associated with layoffs, instability, replacement anxiety, corporate concentration, surveillance, and soaring resource consumption.

    That is an extraordinarily dangerous emotional foundation for a transformative technology.

    The commencement boos matter because they reveal how culturally toxic AI has already become among many young educated Americans. These students understand artificial intelligence well enough to fear it precisely because they already use it. They use it for papers, coding assistance, presentations, summaries, and research. They know the technology works. They know it is improving rapidly.

    “oh no, people dislike this wonderful technology!! But it’s so wonderful!!”

    Whether America ultimately requires these facilities to remain economically competitive may eventually become a legitimate policy debate, but politically that question is almost secondary.

    “we really need this stuff guys, people are mad so it might not happen but it’s really really important so think of that too”