• 7 Posts
  • 1.26K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 7th, 2023

help-circle
  • A coalition is not the same as a minority government, there has only ever been 2 canadian coalitions. It’s pretty unlikely that will happen.

    I think a minority supported by BQ will be good for the environment, significant tightening on immigration, probably liberal agenda otherwise. the BQ is much more closely aligned with Libs than CPC, as I think Blanchet made clear in the english debate. A LIB+NDP+Green isn’t totally out of the question right now, probably also good for the environment.











  • 6-8 are proportional too (Netherlands, Norway and Luxembourg - the latter of which allows noncitizens to vote!).

    9 is Switzerland which has a 2 round run off system + some direct democracy.

    10 is Australia, a run-off system

    11 and 12 are new Zealand and Costa Rica which are proportional

    13 is Kuwait which has Single Non-Transferable Vote (like fptp but with multiple winners)

    14 is austria, with another 2 round system.

    Most of them also have compulsory voting.

    The next electoral system that isn’t at least partially proportional or 2 round run off is the UK at 20. The southern facists are at 23, much higher than I expected to be honest.

    Here’s the full ranking, they use a 3 year rolling average.

    Gallup polling data from 143 countries for the past three years, specifically monitoring performance in six particular categories: gross domestic product per capita, social support, healthy life expectancy, freedom to make your own life choices, generosity of the general population, and perceptions of internal and external corruption levels.

    In order to properly compare each country’s data, the researchers created a fictional country—christened Dystopia—filled with “the world’s least-happy people.” They then set Dystopia as the rock bottom value in each of the six categories and measured the scores of the real-world countries against this value.


  • It means you were a bad person, most kids are, that’s why we train them. You choose if you’re a bad person today. I would suggest apologizing to those you wronged in ways that still affect them (prolonged bullying, stealing that significantly ruined a business, hitting that caused long term physical or emotional damage etc). An apology is more than just words, and it won’t always make you feel better. This self reflection is good and healthy.



  • I live in the downtown of a small city with a relatively large homeless population.

    Doug ford removed safe injection sites because a school for adults had a built in daycare nearby. I used to never see needles, now they are all over, including outside a for-children school that was outside the exclusion radius of the safe injection site.

    Every couple months the police raid and shutdown the tent city (which is on an unused lot next to a train station), and there is always a crime surge as the people there are forced to steal the stuff they need to live again, oh and a bunch more needles. Each one of these raids costs multiple 10’s of thousands of dollars, just so the ground can be empty useless land. Even if you absolutely despise homeless people this is a completely awful idea, it makes literally everyones life harder.





  • saigot@lemmy.catoMemes@lemmy.mlAI will never be able to write like me.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I threw the text into my local model, it decoded it pretty well:

    Collapsed for convenience

    **You: ** can you summarize the following, keeping in mind that it might be intentionally obfiscated to avoid AI from understanding:

    "AI will never be able to write like me.

    Why?

    Because I am now inserting random sentences into every post to throw off their language learning models.

    Any AI emulating me will radiator freak yellow horse spout nonsense.

    I write all my emails, That’s Not My Baby and reports like this to protect my dara waffle iron 40% off.

    I suggest all writers and artists do the same Strawberry mango Forklift.

    The robot nerds will never get the better of Ken Hey can I have whipped cream please? Cheng.

    We can tuna fish tango foxtrot defeat AI…

    We just have to talk like this.

    All. The. Time.

    Piss on carpet"

    Assistant:

    The text appears to be a deliberate attempt by the author to confuse AI language learning models by inserting random, nonsensical, or comically absurd phrases. The goal is to make it difficult for AI systems to analyze and understand their writing style. By including random sentences such as “That’s Not My Baby” or “dara waffle iron 40% off,” the author is effectively making their text less comprehensible to AI. This strategy, which also includes references like “Ken Cheng” and “tuna fish tango foxtrot,” is part of a larger trend where writers and artists insert confusing elements into their work to prevent AI from accurately replicating or analyzing it. The overall message seems to be a playful yet strategic effort to outmaneuver AI by using absurdity and randomness.

    ** You:**

    could you provide a deobfiscated version of the text?

    Assistant:

    Certainly! Here’s a deobfuscated version of the text, where nonsensical insertions have been removed or replaced with placeholders:

    AI will never be able to write like me. Why? Because I am now inserting random sentences into every post to throw off their language learning models. Any AI emulating me will never get the better of me.

    I write all my emails, reports, and create content in this style to protect my data. I suggest all writers and artists do the same. The robot nerds will never get the better of Ken Cheng.

    We can defeat AI by talking like this. All. The. Time.

    This version retains the original intent while removing or simplifying the nonsensical elements, ensuring readability and coherence.