The vegans are malnourished
What makes you say that?
the vegans are week
I think you mean “weak” but again, why do you say that?
Plus go read a scientific paper about how many animals get killed in the production of vegan food.
Can you provide a reference to such a paper?
still don’t understand how you think meat eaters are being harmed by the poor psychological state of the animals while they were alive
Psychological state has a great impact on the physical body. Hormones, neurotransmitters, etc., can be released or suppressed depending on psychological state. When you consume part of an animal, you consume part of that system. Think of the rush of chemicals (cortisol, adrenalin, etc.) in an animal as they’re being slaughtered.
I could say more about subtle energy and karma but you probably get the idea.
Holy shiiit! Spain offering vegan school meals. I am astonished.
the beef which enters a person’s body won’t be harmful to them (the person) at all
I differ completely.
If you’re talking about the psychological state the animals are in while they are alive
Well there’s no psychological state when they’re dead :-)
more space and such,) which results as far as I know, in a better psychological state
Cows having more absolute space than chickens doesn’t imply that cows will have a better psychological state. What matters is how much space the animals have relative to how much space the animals need. I would expect farms to give animals precisely as little space as the farm can get away with, meaning the degree of suffering will be exactly at the point of maximum suffering while still surviving, for cows and chickens.
Regardless, I think there’s likely more harm to meat eaters due to the psychological impact of being slaughtered.
Generally, there’s no data on these issues so it’s all just opinion either way. Suffice it to say that to me, your position seems naive.
industrial cows are treated mildly better because it is literally impossible for a cow to survive in the conditions chickens are kept in
You seem to be talking about material conditions. What concerns me more are the psychological conditions and I don’t believe there to be any difference in that respect.
Do you believe that the beef which enters a person’s body will be in some way less harmful, all else being equal, than chicken? Solely because of the absolute difference in the material conditions?
deleted by creator
That red spot next to Ukraine makes me ashamed of my auburn hair :-(
Edit: curious why the downvotes?
disorganized thinking like that
What disorganised thinking?
Because safe zones conflict with genocide.
being a bit moderate makes me less of an obnoxious cunt
Dafuq?
You’ll eat beef but not chickens? You consider cows to be treated differently to how chickens are treated?
I’m going to add .world’s c/startrek and c/tenforward to the links section of our community and I hope you guys do the same.
Why?! They are totally different shows that share no similarities, do not share themes, do not share numerous details, share no actors, writers or directors and are just completely different, distinct SF shows!
/s
You suggest that a person take it seriously
What they meant is to approach the practice sincerely, genuinely and seriously. They didn’t mean presume correctness or put unreasonable faith in anything.
I am telling him to stop pretending to misunderstand
There’s no reason to think that they are pretending.
You people, I swear
Clearly you’ve brought expectations with you.
For you specifically, I think it may destroy your life.
NO U!
LOL
PureOS already existed for Purism’s laptops. Purism didn’t start PureOS for the phone.
It was the GNOME Shell folks themselves who said not to use GNOME Shell on mobile because “it’s a trap”.
phosh was written from scratch.