

I became anti-death penalty because the real world data of how it has been applied clearly shows the state does not apply it evenly to all. It disproportional is applied to people of color. Moreover, the state has shown it doesn’t convict evenly, so not only can people be wrongfully convicted at a higher rate for some, but they can even be put to death by the state. So innocent people are being wrongfully convicted and even put to death. Until we, as a society, can apply laws and punishments evenly, we cannot have laws and punishments only for some. So the death penalty should be off the table.
Fiscally, the death penalty is also more expensive to enforce than life in prison. So ethically or fiscally, the death penalty should be abolished.
I am arguing that not being allowed to die is a worse situation than being forced to die (as we are mortal creatures).
It isn’t though. You say you don’t want to die, but you’re also handwaving away what it means to not die. Its like you want to live in a limbo, but that isn’t a choice. What I’m getting more of is you’d prefer not to be human. I get that. We’re kind of miserable creatures even when we’re at our best, but if that is the argument you want to go with, then that is something else entirely.
Tell me that you accept the horrors of forced life as a human over a certain future of non-existence at some point, and I’ll take you at your word.