Wait, wasn’t this posted once before and everyone hated that it used the wrong cheese or something?

There’ve been a lot of mistakes made over the years.

ItsTheSamePicture.jpg

deleted by creator

One of those “we’re not the same” sort of things I wager.

Progressives see the established DNC as the vehicle trump used to get into power and install a fascist dictatorship today. So they’re pretty useless.

They would rather the funds go to progressives than establishment DNCs, as progressives typically fight against shit like this rather than being a part of the neoliberal group like many incumbent DNC leaders are.

Taking down Act Blue is probably not a good idea, but I think progressives are upset that there’s not something like that for less entrenched democratic/progressive candidates to use.

Yeah, I’m pretty hype for this. It’s got just the basics of what’s needed, and if you want to mod it with upgrades you can.

I only wish there was a way to make it AWD/4WD, and if there was a way for it to tow a little more weight, then it’d be perfect.

As it is now, it’s still a very compelling concept that I might get into as outside of towing, it solves all the things I need a truck for.

Ah, but his dad wasn’t eating cheeseburgers every day and refusing to work out because he thinks it’ll kill him faster.

Plus, his dad was in a bad way for the last decade or so of his life.

You’re right though, he could live to be 90. Which would suck. But somehow, I just have to imagine there’s only so far the best medical care in the world will take you when you’re on adderall and pepsi/hamburders all day.

I might be getting misunderstood here.

They are going to make an attempt for a third term. They are going to claim some constitutional loophole and the SCOTUS is going to agree with them.

This is and always has been their plan. They’ve been screaming it from the rafters for the last 8+ years.

This will happen one way or another, Trump will likely get “cleared” for a third term for some bullshit reason that every “constitutional lawyer” will decry foul on, but it will still happen because the pillars of our democracy have already crumbled.

After that happens, we can either try and fight it and live in the past, or we can lean into it and adapt to fascism to fight fire with fire until such time that we can rebuild the pillars of our democracy.

The 2 term limit was added as an amendment in 1947 after FDR was so damn popular that he would have just kept running and winning until he died, and the other side didn’t like it.

They fascists should be more scared of repealing the 2 term limit than progressives, if they studied history. Which they don’t. So here we are.

Edit: Why are you downvoting me for simply stating what is planning to and going to happen based on what’s already been done so far? Trump should have never been allowed to run for a second term, he’s got a 34 felony convictions, had several ongoing investigations and trials set including classified documents, fraud, rape, treason, and a coup attempt. If they cared about the constitution, he should have been outright barred from running at all, just like CO Supreme court ruled before the election. But the SCOTUS is in his pocket so they will overrule anything to give Trump an advantage.

This will keep happening, downvoting me does not stop it. We can talk about what the appropriate level of response should be when it does happen, which is what I assumed we were doing, but it’s going to happen. I’m on the side of the camp that’s tired of taking the high road against fascism. It sounds like you’re not. That’s ok. We’re still on the same team and should work together to produce the optimal outcome for the most people here. We’re not enemies. We just have different approaches/responses to fighting fascists. That’s ok. I respect the high road perspective. I just don’t think it’s going to work. Because it hasn’t yet, and all we do are pile up losses to fascists.

As mentioned in another reply, this is more fighting fire with fire sort of thing. They’re going to trample all over the constitution one way or another here it looks like. They already have. the SCOTUS has legislated some incredibly unconstitutional rulings in the last several years, so it’s going to keep happening.

We can either stick our heads in the sand and say: NO, MUH CONSTITNTUION, and hide behind what is ultimately just a piece of paper with some words on it if nobody in power is willing to defend it; or we can adapt and fight fire with fire until we can fix the institutions that have collapsed and recover our democracy.

If you try and take the high road with fascists, they’ll just keep winning. That’s literally what Fascism was created to destroy.

Fascism always looks the same, regardless of the year or circumstances of the situation. Fascism never changes. All they do is paint a thin veneer on the previous fascist attempt and try again, and again, and again, and again, and again.

It can be very, very inexpensive for the costs of a court filing fee and a friend getting an online certification to officiate the wedding.

You get tax breaks while married, and a lot of things in life are easier when you’re married and sharing the same living space, bills, etc. The world has been built to make it more economical and easier.

It’s the getting divorced that’s expensive and sucks. As long as you can avoid doing that, or have a prenup in place, you’re good.

Absolutely not. I would rather the constitution not get used like toilet paper for this waste of human space. But if they go full authoritarian, why not lean into it and play our own hand in a similar vein?

I’m tired of taking the high road against fascists.

Let’s be honest. His health isn’t going to make it. But regardless, if true, we should run Obama against him just so he can lose to a black man, again, before he dies.

“Not resonating with voters”

Bernie and AOC’s “Fighting Oligarchy” campaign is pulling in more people to their rallies than attended Obama’s in 08.

Don’t peddle that horseshit you Liberal traitor.

Did his car’s pager go off?

China: “We haven’t met yet”

China: <backchannels talks so they all get on the same page"

Trump: “China lies, we met this morning when they backchanneled their plans to replace the USD with me and I think it’s a fine idea.”

My people have a similar saying.

I legitimately thought it was right up until the Newsweek article actually loaded.

This is the correct answer

Because he picked a single apple off the highest part of the tree, instead of the low hanging fruit that the DoD/Pentagon currently has on full display.

Climbed right past them, all the way to the top, to pick the smallest fucking apple that hurts the most people.