X’s lawsuit claims the law’s “requirements are so vague and unintelligible that social media platforms cannot understand what the statute permits and what it prohibits.”

Vague, overly broad laws are indeed a problem; I’m willing to give him that. ONLY that.

Unfortunately for Musk, this is not vague. If the footage is something you created or manipulated, you know perfectly damn well whether it’s legal or not. He’s trying to confuse the issue, and conflate fraud with free speech. Hopefully, the court will see right through him.

Stiff and formal, yeah, but it doesn’t give you the sense that hatred is the only possible interpretation.

As a Brit myself, it saddens me how much hate is leeching from my country - especially towards minorities.

As an American, I understand.

To someone who doesn’t know any better, "adult human female” sounds so innocuous. If the rest of the post or comment was carefully phrased, it probably would have gotten past me. Thank you for the clarification.

She shuts down hatred with such sincere grace that it’s impressive. Personally, I admire her restraint most of all.

She frequently deals with idiots and jerks. Hints at condescension or sly insults would be easy, but she effortlessly avoids stooping to such a level. She stays laser-focused on the topic. Behavior like that makes her comments even more powerful.

You deserve to see this @https://fedia.io/u/@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone Thanks for all your hard work!

Edit: that tag is sloppy as hell. I still don’t know what I’m doing lol please don’t hold it against me

Okay, I get it. I think you’re right.

What’s a “sound font”?

The hardware store close to my house doesn’t have anything that’s anywhere near this cool.

If it’s against the community rules, it’s either ignorance or deliberate obnoxiousness. When possible, assume ignorance - not everyone is as good as spotting AI slop as you probably are.

If it’s NOT against community rules, then it’s just a matter of personal taste - or, again, ignorance.

This is now one of my favorite uses of this meme format.

It also hurts constantly

Not seeing an image

I’m SO glad they included “drafted by Florida hypnotist” in the headline. We all just skim headlines sometimes, and that portion speaks volumes.

Ah. You edited your post after I responded to it. Classy.

I don’t make memes, so you can see me however you want.

I didn’t think of that. Good point.

Still, it might be worth considering if you’re (A) an idiot, and (B) keep getting turned down by those picky would-be parents who insist that you don’t smoke or drink while pregnant.

Memes have often been ripoffs of copyrighted material anyway, so I think making silly jokes that can’t be profited from is the one of the most “ethical” uses for AI that you’re gonna find.

For “real” art, however you choose to define that, nothing will ever beat a genuine, human artist. Period.

For memes, I don’t care where the images come from. The art is in the humor, the combination of text plus imagery, and only a person is going to get that right. I don’t know if that answers your question, but those are my thoughts on the subject.

Do you get the $5,000 bonus even if you immediately put the child up for adoption? For some people, going this route could be more profitable than the pyramid scheme they call their “side hustle”.

Okay.

“Were”? I still get them!

Some of the best memes feature terrible artwork and/or editing. AI slop is perfect for memes.

Edit: a lot of people have opinions about this one. They might be in favor of AI art and are annoyed that I called it “slop”, or they’re against AI art and mad that I dared suggest that it’s good for something. Either way, they sure hate my comment!