I feel called out.

Okay, a hard refresh and now its showing up. (ctrl + shift +r)

As a user level verification, I don’t see a checkbox for post https://pawb.social/post/22913626 I’m on the default web interface. The post was marked as NSFW originally by some developer tools trickery.

Just as a hack, when creating a new post, most of the information is passed as parameters in the URL, you can ensure the NSFW flag is set for the front end by ensuring nsfw=true is one of the parameters in the request.

Digikey is my go-to. I hope they make it through.

From my poking around, Its a little more complicated. https://pawb.social/post/22913999/14927820. Its treated as NSFW, but some front ends don’t add the visible tag. It is still possible to add the visible tag, but its not really obvious.

Similar to nitro for a user, but for a server as a whole. At various levels it add features to servers. Bigger files, more sticker slots, Banners, animated server icons, higher quality streaming, more options for invite links and how they appear…

It was changed in the latest version of lemmy. lemmynsfw has their own patches that make things work better for their use. In general its just a mess right now. I was looking into this in a local community. The visual nsfw tag seems to be an issues on a community level, but I don’t mod or admin any so I can’t dig too deep into it other than observe the user behavior. Although the NSFW is sometimes present the posts are treated as NSFW. (blocked if NSFW is blocked in settings, blurred if NSFW is blurred in settings…)

lemmy has a new quirk where all posts are treated as NSFW in a nsfw community even if they are not tagged in the front end as such. In fact the ability to tag has been removed from the front end. This was a recent change, I don’t think its going like they planned.

The property itself still seems toggle-able with the api. The changelog and pull linked seem to be only on the default front end. I don’t see an associated change with the back-end which is mentioned in the PR. If web tools are enabled, the toggle shows up for creating a post. If you add nsfw=true as a parameter in the submission URL it is marked appropriately, but it is not set by default. https://lemmynsfw.com/post/23232239 (This seems to have caused issues elsewhere too).

After playing around with it. the posts don’t show up unless nsfw is enabled, but if you have nsfw enabled the post does not have the visible nsfw marking. If you don’t blur NSFW posts, there is no visible way to know it is NSFW

TL;DR It is treated as NSFW, but it is not visibly marked as NSFW.

I’ll comment outbound seems off too. I checked from lemmy.world and new stuff from here is missing.

Have the whole movie as an add? Yes, but I will have to look it up. I think it was to advertise the opening of the second movie.

Edit: yep. It was a promotion for the second movie.

I’ve never quite figured out how to get mentions to work properly. I also don’t want to come across as impatient by spamming you across every method.

Thanks for all you do. What is the best way to let you know when these things happen?

umm, no. I use work chats for work, and personal chats for personal. I might accidentally add the wrong colleague to a work chat, or wrong friend to a personal chat, but I’m never going to accidentally add a friend to a work chat because I don’t mix work and personal chats.

Did everything come back up as expected? Seems pictrs is having issues for some folks. https://pawb.social/post/21953795

I think I want one.

authoritarianism is another word that can mean different things to different people. It can be used to mean the government enforcing any rule that isn’t liked. civil rights protection? authoritarianism. job protections? authoritarianism. minimum wage? authoritarianism. etc…

Also related is “small government”. I think people who use it mean (at least when not in control) “small federal government”, the state however should control everything about peoples lives.

I almost think its the laws they support are black and white and unchanging. If something is wrong with a law, it doesn’t matter, that’s the law. The solution to an issue isn’t to change the law, its to enforce it harder, or make it more restrictive. The “rule of law” also applies to individuals and actions. Money crimes, fraud, “the state” are not subject to the same “rule of law” because those laws “don’t make sense” and if we look above are a result of “authoritarianism”.

Is there a solution to get people to use language that can be agreed upon? who knows, but it would certainly help clear things up. I hate trying to guess what someone thinks a word means to attempt to refute their points.

I don’t know I’ve though about “rule of law” quite that way before. I’ll have to add it to my list for when it comes up. There are several other terms that mean different things to different people (I wish I remembered a specific one to demonstrate). Its one of the reasons its hard to have political discussion online. You have to determine what the words your using mean, before you can start arguing the points.

Assuming he believes his words (as opposed to using rhetoric to get what he or someone around him wants, in either case unfortunately, I think he’s serious). I think he sees anything purchased from another country as “subsidizing” that country. To him, its money the US had that Canada now has. I sometimes think he somehow thinks the US should be given things, because…??? Every transaction has to have a “winner” and a “looser” and whoever has a + on the balance sheet is the winner, it doesn’t matter what that + really means. (I can only bend my logic so far to try to figure these things out)