hungrybread [comrade/them]

  • 6 Posts
  • 171 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 19th, 2021

help-circle





  • I wasn’t going to go as far as to say its intellectual masturbation, but I see your point. I think once people start decomposing the world through a materialist lens (intentionally or not, usually just through exposure to new ideas or there own material conditions) its easier to spot the gaps in the ideology running through media. The fact that the gaps can be so glaring can make them seem intentional, maybe even radical , when the consumer is looking for that.

    I guess that’s my masturbatory way of saying its projection.

    As someone who doesn’t consume much media in the way of shows or movies I hate this pattern. I’ve been disappointed by a number of them this way: the substance, squid game (haven’t watched s2), etc. They’re still enjoyable on their own but its another way to overhype content. Its fine to just enjoy the show even if it doesn’t teach a radical message.






  • I wonder if including an email folks can use in your posts would help with traction. I know I’ve personally only felt comfortable providing aid when an email/cashapp/paypal is in the post (I dont always get lenmy notifications in a timely fashion, so I tend to avoid starting a conversation if it needs to happen quickly).

    Of course, feel free to use an alt or burner email for privacy.

    I hope we can get you some food comrade


  • I’m too lazy to look for any of their documentation about this, but it would be pretty bold to believe privacy or processing claims from OpenAI or similar AI orgs, given their history flouting copyright.

    Silicon valley more generally just breaks laws and regulations to “disrupt”. Why wouldn’t an org like OpenAI at least leave a backdoor for themselves to process API requests down the road as a policy change? Not that they would need to, but it’s not uncommon for a co to leave an escape hatch in their policies.





  • I have returned with news. I bought 2 pairs of the fully cotton socks, worn them several times, and washed them once.

    • a little rougher than I expected, but they’re fine when you expect that
    • before washing they were a little loose at the top but not so much they’d slip off your feet
    • after washing (I made the mistake of machine washing, dried on a line though) they are much looser so far. These should definitely be hand washed.
    • besides the looseness, it feels like they held up in the wash alright
    • the site explicitly says to expect more wear and tear than socks with elastic, which seems about right. They’d probably hold up ok if worn in slippers and consistently hand washed.

    I definitely liked them pre-washing, and would consider buying them again. They aren’t for everyone though, they are definitely rougher and more stiff than whats commonly available.

    If I remember I’ll update this post a little down the line with more wear and tear thoughts.



  • I gotta say, the C02 number seems very high to me too, just got that from a quick search and saw that a couple of times. I haven’t investigated it closely tbh.

    I wasn’t aware of the mining differences between uranium and thorium, that is encouraging.

    Regarding the waste, that’s a fair point as well. Thanks for the response! Interesting points.

    I used to be very pro nuclear energy. Besides the waste and the occasional meltdown it seemed like a no brainer as a renewable supplement. After learning a little more about it though it just seems like we have more runway for positive growth with wind and solar than nuclear, but I’d be happy to be proven wrong.


  • From what I understand nuclear in general is (at least now) a dead end as a climate change solution.

    1. From planning time to turning on the reactor is something like 15 - 20 years (note, that’s longer than the global average of 7 years for construction, because construction is not the whole picture)
    2. It’s difficult to have more than 1 plant project ongoing simultaneously due to the scale and complexity
    3. Nuclear plants take a lot of C02 to construct and maintain. The fuel has to be mined, resulting in emissions, and the amount of concrete required massive. 1 ton of concrete creates .8-.9 tons of C02, and a nuclear power plant has hundreds of thousands of tons of concrete in it.
    4. We still don’t have a good answer for handling nuclear waste.

    Maybe at some point in the past nuclear could have resolved many climate change issues, but between project time, initial emission cost, and waste, it just doesn’t seem viable anymore.