

You’re reading text from a picture. That is OCR.
You’re reading text from a picture. That is OCR.
That was a good read, thank you!
Well I was wrong, thank you for educating me. That list is a bit disappointing…
Could you show an example? GOG has no DRM, for any game. That’s kind of their thing. I was wrong, there’s a full list.
There isn’t much of the brand that is Canadian anymore, it’s all Chinese owned. So unfortunately I don’t believe that reasonable take is the actual one.
Appreciate the sentiment, but rule 1 of the community states that you should keep the original title when submitting an article, using the body or a comment to put your commentary.
Got it, a xenophobic bigot. I won’t engage further, you’re not worth it. I encourage others to simply block you, as I’m doing right now.
So if I understand you correctly, you’re saying that him being a Muslim makes it inevitable that he will apply Sharia law (or something equivalent) to NYC?
Just say the racist thing you’re only implying, for all of us to see.
I’m unable to visualize things in my mind, are you actually saying that it means I cannot self reflect? That’s certainly a take… Also one that is not presented in the aphantasia article you linked, so I wonder where this jump in logic came from.
Feels like you just don’t know what aphantasia is, even though you linked an article about it. And what’s this “aphantasia from the inner self”?
As said by another, no need to offer the service worldwide, no need to be competitive, just need not to give them our data. It will cost a lot yes, but I’d much rather that than giving freely all our data to a fascist government and a kowtowing corporation.
Also nice moving of the goalposts, you first said that the article’s title was deceptive, “because the datacenters are in Canada”. I maintain my claim that this changes absolutely nothing to the story.
What does that change? It’s still property of Microsoft, and they’ve stated quite recently that US law will override any notion of sovereignty or ownership. So the datacenters could be anywhere, the data is, for all intents and purposes, american.
Well, the thing is, you just admitted that your initial comment about Firefox being more vulnerable was based on nothing, since you did your research only after. Then you so quickly went over the data you looked for that you only saw that total that seemed to confirm your unfounded bias, where the tables have that very readable color code to them, making 2015 and 2016 really jump to the eye.
Of course, now that the data you found goes against your bias, you just look to discredit it, instead of thinking “you know, maybe this isn’t as clear-cut as I thought it was”.
So no, no charity there. I’ll keel it for those who act in good faith, thank you.
For starters, if I had not called you out, you wouldn’t have provided sources. So my point still stands, your previous message, unsourced, was fear mongering.
Onto your data. Funny that you wrote the total from 2015, not mentioning that 127 of those code execution vulns are from 2015 and 2016… So 8 code exec since 2017, versus 85 for Chrome. I don’t think we can attribute that only to market share.
Either you don’t know how to read a table, or you purposefully ignored that part, perhaps hoping no-one would click on your links?
almost certainly has more vulnerabilities than Chromium browsers
Unless you have real world data that confirms it, this is just fear mongering.
I haven’t seen anyone, even the worst of them, pretend we’re already at AGIs. Granted some of them pretend we’re getting close to AGIs, which is an outrageous lie, but a different one.
I’m not white and from now on I’m even more likely to get shot than before.
I’d argue that with him alive and continuing to spew his hate and calls for violence, that probability would have unfortunately continued to go up. It went up by a bigger margin with his death sure, but it wouldn’t have stopped with him not being shot.
That being said, I do feel very bad for you and all those affected.
The department began to use a computer model in 2018 called “advanced data analytics” to sort cases and help officers make eligibility decisions. It claims the system can speed processing by up to 87 per cent.
87%… Well this is not worrying at all!
A 2018 Chinook user manual released under access to information suggests an officer can use the system to examine up to 1,000 cases at the same time.
Yep, nothing to worry about, definitely.
It always warms my heart to see older memes still being relevant and shared.
Here in North America small-ish bottles will usually contain like 50 pills. Can be 100. Then there are the bigger bottles, like 500 pills in one. All OTC.