Interests: News, Finance, Computer, Science, Tech, and Living

  • 28 Posts
  • 1.19K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 13th, 2023

help-circle




  • I agree. The Chinese are the most interesting. Trying to integrate a more flexible market economy into their social system is a huge accomplishment and what is needed.

    The reverse is needed in the US. The other big challenge in the US is quality of leadership. Democracy requires an educated and engaged electorate, access to true information, honest fact based debate, good decision making, and a willingness to make it work. All in short supply these days.




  • Then you come up with better word.

    In my definition, any system where the general public cannot throw out the bums without violence is authoritarian.

    The is the fundamental reason communism is not viable. It just swaps distributed power for the even bigger problem of bigger concentrated power.

    Just look at happyness indexes. We know the solutions that tend yield best results. They tend to be democracies with a fairly homogenious population and a socialist bent. Capitalists hate this and I assume communists do too because it shows neither is the way.


  • Actually in the US socialism is more popular then you might think. Bernie Sanders was very popular a few years ago and showed significant support in the presidential race. Mamdani just won the NY mayors race.

    What we do not care for in the US is authoritarianism which seems to be the result of any extreme either libertarianism or communism, and we are too damed independent for our own good. I makes me both laugh and cry when the current situation is not good for 80% of people but with minor exceptions they still vote for it.







  • The thing about most default configs of any OS is that user storage is largely accessable to all apps. True of Linux, Android. Windows, …

    Graphene has options to restrict that but you have to set it up that way. Android also has App sandboxing for app data.

    Thinking through the threat model of course is always good as is hardening. All security is porous. Linux is fine generally. If one is exposing services on the public net it is not clear that any OS or software is sufficiently secure, that takes constant effort in terms of monitoring and management.