No

No internal domain could connect to anything if it wasn’t resolved for an ip.

Local IPv4 work. Global ipv4 work. Ipv6 works. Mesh vpn ips work. Any ip works.

You may have to adjust the config.php (iirc) to add the ip/domain to trusted domains

Nextcloud wants you to buy their stuff.

If you want to selfhost you have to read “everything” and know what you do.

I have no idea about that all in one setup. But yes, the sentence “nextcloud can not be reached via IP” is wrong

Use docker or podman compose https://hub.docker.com/_/nextcloud/

Nextcloud does not need a domain. Ip is fine.

Thanks!

After updating oh my zsh, sry for the confusion

You are right! My bad, sorry! Thanks!

I’m curious how it goes.

My osm experience tells me there is only either right or wrong

Why are there likes on a wiki?

Wgat’s the advantage over musicbrainz?

I assume there shall be greasemonkey, beets support down the line?

I just read searxng with a Chi as X and it made sense … wow😅

Thx for the clarification.

Don’t be afraid to drop a tool although you’ve spent years mastering it if there is something new that is much more efficient. Some day you have to switch anyway.

They added the attribution

https://github.com/avtakkar/peerd/commit/15aa104827b5552d48a7462eef6d040eca2ad582

https://github.com/Azure/peerd/issues/109

They added the attribution

https://github.com/avtakkar/peerd/commit/15aa104827b5552d48a7462eef6d040eca2ad582

https://github.com/Azure/peerd/issues/109

We want legislation requiring that publicly financed software developed for the public sector be made publicly available under a Free and Open Source Software licence. If it is public money, it should be public code as well.

I’d go even further than that. I’d require any (unless confidential) code development to be open and freely available. Meaning, if you buy a license to use software, that software should be open source.

It should be like on our private devices where we only install proprietary stuff if it is inevitable like a baking app.

EU is having a good stance on the issue. afaik, EUPL that they use is also a free license.

Why?

What is the benefit of fedora and its atomic version, if you use flatpak and distrobox on both installs? Add btrfs snapshots and you can’t brick your system either, which is your point, I guess

How can you tell that it’s a good shoe? I tried resesrching it but it’s wishy-washy

You’re right, that’s gone

I’m on your side but we shouldn’t mock op but support him.

Microsoft’s still has MIT license