• 1 Post
  • 150 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 18th, 2024

help-circle


  • I’m not,

    I’m genuinely skeptical that most polls are an accurate sampling of the population. Most people I know would never sit through a phone poll. Most polls reek of phishing. One of the very first phone polls said that Dewy would beat Truman in a landslide. It was completely wrong because it was predominantly rich people who had the phones to even answer the polls.

    Who has the time for polls? Who drops by the candidate booths at the state fair? It’s a type for sure.

    The only poll I have been a part of all last year was a phone poll entirely about optometrists and eye appointments and how they should be handled in the healthcare system. I couldn’t even finish it because the entire things was just… painful to go through.









  • dukeofdummies@lemmy.worldtoGreentext@sh.itjust.worksAnon is worried about men
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 days ago
    1. Historically only men showing up

    2. Only desperate people showing up

    3. Has anything good ever come from a speed dating event? I haven’t heard of one.

    They just don’t have a great reputation in general. I went to a speed friending event once and, ugh, that was not fun.

    To make matters even crazier, younger generations are also just… not even trying to hook up. Some studies are showing 45% of men age 18-25 have never even approached a woman romantically.

    Not succeeded, just even tried.

    Dating be incredibly fucking weird right now.




  • It totally is in my experience. I have literally sat in meetings pushing AI… but absolutely NO steering or discussion on what we ought to do with it. They will relabel related things that have existed for years as AI.

    It’s like instead of having a bunch of nails and needing a way to pound them in, we’ve been given a nail gun and a requirement to use it.

    “But we sell balloons”

    “Dont worry, the nail gun will make everything better”




  • Nah nah nah, it’s just a different paradigm. It’s like… it’s a different meta, but for programming.

    If I was to ELI5, I’d say it’s the difference between making a series of objects that interact with each other (OOP) and and creating a very large console with lots of buttons (functional)

    Some problems are much easier object oriented. If you have a video game, building a projectile class and adding different types of projectiles makes things suuuper easy to build. Arrows move slow and deal x damage, beams move super fast and deal y.

    Functional can be easier to troubleshoot, also easier to crank out novel things, easier to make secure, and even make simultaneous operations trivial. It has very different problems though. You need to put more effort into eliminating dependencies.

    The two do not play well together at all they’re like fire and water. Sometimes you need water to soak something and make it easier to work, sometimes you need heat to melt something and make it easier to work.

    Telecommunications like phones or military applications tend to the functional languages, data, video games, and a lot of the popular languages tend to OOP.

    The transition between the two is jarring, and infuriating, but a knowledge of both can really improve your design skills.