- 90 Posts
- 94 Comments
17·2 months agoFucking love him
22·2 months agodeleted by creator
deleted by creator
Agreed. Makes me wonder if that might’ve been the intention of the opening. The poem is held up by the shock of the last line.
9·2 months agoWe love you Cleo 💜
45·2 months agoA beacon of humanity in an ocean of sadism
7·3 months agoSorry, typo — indeed, codependency.
I dated someone with major depression and PTSD for three years. I’m not going to say it was the easiest experience supporting them, but I loved them very deeply for who they are and we had a nice relationship. Before we met, I hadn’t met anyone I’d related to as much as I had with them. Dating is definitely possible, but as with any dating, it can also be painful and you might not get what you’re looking for. It’s crucial for all of us, not just those majorly depressed, to take care of ourselves through every situation. Be sure to interrogate whether or not the way you’re approaching relationships is exacerbating your depression; if you’re looking for dependencies or not.
I love the “stain of alphabets”. Excellent
Fantastic
4·3 months agodeleted by creator
deleted by creator
82·3 months agoNot long enough
deleted by creator
Looks delicious. Do you have a recipe?
81·4 months agoI get where you’re coming from but I’ve conceptually divorced my brother from these black and white dichotomies for my whole life, and to what cost on my own psyche? Ultimately we do have to pick sides and cultivate our own systems of values based on the world around us. He is not a neutral individual, nor am I.
To me there is only one true dichotomy and he has chosen the side of oligarchy and I have not.
I relate to this very strongly. And maybe it’s not an AITAH type question — I think of it as doing something for myself more than anything else. Sure I might lose relationships with family members but what will I gain emotionally and mentally? And will that outweigh the familial loss in the long run? … Lots to think about
deleted by creator
It’s important to emphasize that legality does have meaning. Their goal is to normalize a fractured and recontextualized notion of legality for the purposes of authoritarianism.