

what kind of shitty news coverage doesn’t even have images of the 75yard hill the vehicle rolled down?
what kind of shitty news coverage doesn’t even have images of the 75yard hill the vehicle rolled down?
and this is why humans are bad, a tool is neither good or bad, sure a tool can use a large amount of resources to develop only to be completely obsolete in a year but only humans (so far) have the ability (and stupidity) to be both in charge of millions of lives and trust a bunch of lithographed rocks to create tarrif rates for uninhabited islands (and the rest of the world).
I always thought those were just there to incentivize turning it off at the breaker /s
it’s less that dimmers are fancier than you thought and more like adjusting voltage or amperage without ridiculous losses is hard and or significantly more expensive than you thought.
it would almost certainly need to be done at a fast charger, not at home unless it could do only a few cells at a time. Remember the golden rule: “Don’t set the house on fire by overloading the wiring”.
both can be true, 5k isn’t enough to pay for a delivery at a hospital, but should absolutely be enough to clothe a baby for a year or two.
Consider that the more heavily impoverished neglected children there are the more desperate abusable workers there will be in the future. (and homeless, but there are solutions, some soup others stew)
nice, I always like to see more interesting applications of human neurons
if the chemicals are extremely different in hazard it could be useful to know that it’s not a mixture, like a superacid and a strong base.
terrestrial towers are great where there are more people than there would need to be towers and where towers are allowed to be built, getting towers installed in national parks is hard and building them in the middle of nowhere has almost no return on investment, satelite networks could fill this niche where the only current option is wildly expensive satilite phones by Garmin and the likes.
Thankfully some airlines just go with the “you need to be able to lift it into the overhead bin” approach source airline.
the fact that they received a validation request is informative that they probably shouldn’t be able to access, however regardless of implementation, assuming causality and the speed of light remain, this will be information the government will recieve. Some entity (probably the government) would* also need to know who to send the response to, technically they could just broadcast this over some low frequency transmission broadcast to everyone, but realistically the government would need some kind of address (IP, fax number, po box, etc.).
Technically this is an implementation detail, however the only ways to implement this type of thing that wouldn’t be comprimizing would involve citizen prompted government broadcasts and trust that the government won’t have records of who requested the broadcast and what number was sent (which would make it trivial for adults to just sell the age identifier) and would still worsen the average citizen’s security because it still takes effort to generate a unique identifier for every site.
cross class “networking” is common and more or less the only way people move up in the class system. Having rich colleagues/ aquatences is an important part of most extremely successful startups and is absolutely something that happens to “middle class” people, just not to those living paycheck to paycheck.
yes, probably more accurately multi millionaires?
yet another reason to avoid water, if you drink less then you only have to piss every day or two.
yes, however the government should NEVER have access to what social messaging apps ANYONE uses without a warrant.
no, the GameCube intro is iconic and the government overreach is chronic
NSFW tag please
idk, they have email
that still uniquely identifies you to the company and would make having multiple accounts that are fully separate harder. in addition there would be no way of knowing whether or not the government has or hasn’t hidden another layer of data (like your name) in the certificate.
This would also be trivial for children to bypass as it would need to be usable an unlimited number of times (or else individuals couldn’t have multiple accounts) therefore it would only take one adult sharing their cert and signature publicly for any child to have a valid certificate.