You can share jellyfin over the net.

The security issues that tend to be quoted are less important than some people claim them to be.

For instance the unauthorized streaming bug, often quoted as one of the worst jellyfin security issues, in order to work the attacker need to know the exact id of the item they want to stream, which is virtually impossible unless they are or have been an authorized client at some point.

Just set it up with the typical bruteforce protections and you’ll be fine.

When I was young I overcame a cold with fever and all over a single night. I felt invencible. Nowadays I feel like half the year I’m still trailing symptoms of one thing or other.

Street piracy vendors (AKA in my country as “top manta”).

They used to be everywhere selling pirated copies of games and movies. As internet popularized they went back to selling questionable trademark infringing clothing.

That’s one of the reasons I stopped using YouTube. I don’t want to see people’s stupid face, it adds nothing and it detracts from the video.

This statement have the following fallacies:

Straw man.

Appeal to emotion.

Ad hominem.

Cherry picking.

Not true Scotsman.

Hasty generalization.

Begging the question.

False dilemma.

I don’t think Lemmy accepts pump-dump or nazi cryptos.

More likely they would accept some of the most famous and established ones. Like them more or like them less, but I don’t see reason to ban them. It’s not like paypal or any bank are angels.

Too vague of a description. I would need a more detailed explanation on what happened to define someone as evil.

As some people may perceive things certain way and other people may perceive them other way.

Even when trauma is implied, I have seem people create their own trauma and blame it on others.

So, there’s that. I would need more information before calling anyone evil or good.

If given all info I could conclude that the person purposely or by negligence of a responsibility caused harm to other person then yes, they would be evil.

Things haven’t been the same to poor Helium since the new constitution was sign and nobility was stripped out of their privileges.

Henry Cavill, seems like a nice guy, and I think we would have a lot of common interests to talk about.

Reaching means addressing their issues. Addressing one person issues will probably conflict with other person issues. Wich mean that a choose have to be made on to who represent.

Some people are easier to address than other. Some people are more exigent to their representatives than others. Making it not wort it trying to address them.

It’s important to mention that just by “mentioning” people in your campaign those people are not going to vote you. You need to do specific politics that solve the problems they may have. Which is not easy and most of the times it opposes what other people want you to do.

Not all countries are the USA btw. Most countries use their defense budget to actually defend themselves from external very real threats.

TIL my body is AI made.

I mean, United Kingdom (for instance) it’s not an absolute monarchy anymore, isn’t it?

It doesn’t really makes much sense.

The amount of power is the same. They don’t get more power by voting a pope every 5 years rather than every 30 years. They still vote for the pope, the person in that position is always there because it was voted by the Cardinals.

If something it would be the opposite. Selecting a person for a longer period would give you more power as your decision is more time in place unable to be challenged.

China will be the best country in the world the same day fusion reactors will be available. Always in ten years. No matter when you read this.

That’s what happen when identity politics mark a group as less important and the enemy.

It happens when right wing do identity politics an the marginalized minorities group together against it.

Left wing for some reason decided to use exactly the same strategy as the right wing and took identity politics as a way to do politics and they are having exactly the same result. The “marginalized” identity turned against them.

Surprised Pikachu face.

I’ve heard someone comparing it to the famous rubber duck.

What phone os do you have?

For me android automatically blocks 90% of spam calls nowadays. I can see them in the phone history, but my phone don’t ring for them.

Some people like to travel in Minecraft. There’s something in just picking a direction and moving there for days, exploring. In Minecraft you would never reach the end. In Luanti you’ll hit the end of the world in a few hours.

Also for massive multiplayer purposes. Servers with hundreds of people are impossible in luanti’s size.

And it’s not just me. You go to Luanti’s forum and one of the biggest threads is one asking for infinite worlds, players want it.

They used to say the the world size was embedded deep into the code and that a massive rewrite would be needed for that and that it was not worth it. But someone already made a fork that has this feature and didn’t change that much so… And no, the fork is not a solution due to Luanti “modular” approach that fork is incompatible with any Luanti game so there’s no game really just the base “engine”.

I don’t have high hopes of devs ever addressing that, so I stopped following the project. I hope be proven wrong, but something tells me that it’s a change that will never me made.

I don’t know about Luanti. The world size limitation is an issue that’s hard to address, and there’s some ‘denial’ going up within their devs about it. Stating that the current world size is more than enough, ignoring the great amount of people asking for bigger worlds.