• 27 Posts
  • 2.36K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: March 22nd, 2024

help-circle
  • I think OP means “the mediocre, least bad intersection between critical mass and topical discussion.”

    Like, you can probably find users/subs about universities/fields and actually find people in them to respond. Lemmy is great, but good luck finding a mass of discussion around a niche location/field.

    Reddit is horrible and deteriorating, yes, but still.


  • brucethemoose@lemmy.worldtoGames@lemmy.worldLarian Studios Talks About Its Future
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Vincke says the team finds DLC boring to make, so they don’t really want to make it anymore.

    I find this driveby comment rather significant.

    It means they are trying to conform to the developers’ strengths, desires, interests. They’re shaping huge business decisions around them. That’s just good for everyone, as opposed to devs inefficiently, dispassionately grinding away at something they don’t like.

    That’s huge. I’d also posit “happy devs means happy business.” And Larian has repeatedly expressed similar things.




  • …So?

    Poking through some of their history (Ernst and Karl), looks like they were indeed Nazi commanders. They served lower ranks after the war, got more education/experience and rose again to perform well within NATO.

    Maybe I’m naive, but I believe horrible people can go on to do good things, and that’s fine. I think my favorite character archetype for this is General Iroh in Avatar, who was involved in unspeakable genocide, changed, and ultimately toppled his own dynasty. He’s one of the most beloved characters in fiction, but a quick bio of his in an image would get him utterly crucified as a terrible human being.

    Hence drive by image posts kinda like this without context/history, on the other hand, largely provoke outrage. It’s exactly the kind of thing that would trend on the Twitter algorithm and obliterate any nuance. That’s not necessarily your intent, but it’s kinda the aggregate effect.




    • A: This is the ‘bad’ kind of incentive. My mom worked in a hospital where people would come in pregnant, tons of neglected kids in tow, asking how much wellfare they could get for the next kid. Stuff like vouchers for school, care, healthcare and stuff doesn’t incentive that.

    • B: It’s hilariously inadequate and out-of-touch. $5K for childcare these days is a joke, even as a nice supplement.

    …But that’s the point. This is for show, like Trump’s COVID checks with his signature on them. It’s a brand to tell people “Hey! I’m Trump, and I’m helping you!” directly, a decent idea poorly implemented for PR purposes. It’s also hilariously hypocritical, seeing how much ‘blank check hand-outs’ were criticized for decades.








  • Also I would add that a quick turn down is exactly what certain factions want. A sort of “Ukraine is a hysterical warmonger, told ya, pull the US out.”

    I think being aggressively nuanced is pragmatic for Ukraine. Call the US out for crystal clear clarification, quickly and loudly. If we can’t articulate that, then it makes us (the US) look dumb to the rest of the world. If we can, then it’s either significant US commitment, or a tear through the facade.

    The key is calling it out before Trump takes over the narrative and this is painted as a gift to Ukraine.