Minus the Golan heights, and sure.

As long as any Palestinian lives, a two-state solution is possible. We need to support the downfall of fascism, and that must occur by support of Palestina and the downfall of oligarchs.

They only own it because the commoners consume theirs. Once we stop doing so, the oligarchs become powerless.

The global group of oligarchs. Through them it was made possible that Russia got seized by fascism, and that China turned ever more capitalist; and that the USA is now a prototypical infant fascist state.

Order can only exist with liberty.
Liberty can only exist with decentralisation. Decentralisation can only exist with anarchocommunism.

Except that MLs repress all of those.

Anarchocommunism represses none, as it favours freedom of speech, freedom from money and greed, and freedom from hierarchy.

Anarchocapitalism doesn’t exist; it’s mostly libertarians in disguise, who want a repressive Cyberpunk dystopia.

Yeah, sure. They frequently repress anarchocommunists.

There is no democracy without anarchy.

That’s when you then turn it around to them.

“We must drive 30 km/hr to show these bastards who’s boss!”.

Then by definition, MLs aren’t communists.

Except that, comrade, the Prague Spring organisers opposed a secret police, which is imho a fascist element. It also focused on decentralisation of the economy. The KGB infiltrated some of the organisations.

The Hungarian 1956 liberation struggle also demanded public ownership of land. While it is true that the CIA had been involved (e.g. inviting the fascist over for reform… gee, Hungary didn’t change much eh?), neither of the revolutions appear 100% bourgeoise. It would have helped to imprison the fascist, and not inform the public.

While it is true that “pro-democracy” often in practice means “pro-bribery” (as oligarchs then are enabled to bribe politicians), the core problem is and remains money even being a thing of prestige.

What should be the rule, is that society must be as resistant to corruption as possible. This is especially critical for factions and cooperations. That means:

• All must be obliged to organise according to decentralised worker democracy. No boss, no master. Freedom of discussion, freedom of action.

• No one who ever has led/owned a private company may be part of a group.

• The groups must finance themselves through the principle of a moneyless, barterless gift economy, and mutual aid.

• Full transparency of finances is required, including ultimate sources. This will encourage people to make the ‘stream’ of resources as direct as possible.

• If a group does not adhere to even one of these principles, it is automatically considered defunct and disbands; and the members will be part of a group that does adhere to it. Those who made the group no longer adhere to all principles, will be societally barred from mutual aid (transport, food, housing, and so on). In other words, don’t be a corrupt person.

• Groups can not be bigger than 150 people, but can mutually aid each other and cooperate in federations, which must also be organised through all above principles.

It doesn’t per se prioritise order inasmuch it prioritises state tyranny.

I view tankies as marginally better than fascists in that they at least strive for universal healthcare, universal housing, and so on. But when it comes to being able to choose, they’re just as terrible.

Order can only be achieved through freedom from intolerance. The true answer lies in anarchocommunism.

I think the confusing part is that liberal in there refers not to the ideology but to free in choice.

Maybe a better wording would’ve been “free” or just “democratic”, leaving out the “liberal” entirely.

nice try, CIA

Controversial take, but I think cars should lose more space to housing, greenery, mainwalks, and bicycle pathes.

Re: the last one, there’s actually someone verified with that size. But another’s funnier - he claims to have the biggest one. He can envelop a doorknob with his fore- user was muted

A working uterus.

Oh, and laser eyes.

hmm;;; not suwe whethw t be scawed or awousd…,

For now.

I don’t trust the fascist US government at all.

where’d you steal a picture of me and why is this so funny

Self-gaslighting - into selfdepreciation, perhaps?

There’s everything controversial. I believe the “biological factors” and “'muscle mass” and “unfair student athletic advantage” is just bullshit for policing who can sport where.

Let queer people be themselves and pick themselves where they feel safe.

“Fair competition” MUST mean that queer people aren’t policed by oligarch billionnaires stuck in the 18th Century. Your shit doesn’t help.