• 0 Posts
  • 164 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 6th, 2023

help-circle
  • That’s an interesting take. One on one side the death is a haphazard byproduct and on the other it is at least motivated by someone. Somebody has to have a vision for why these weapons need to be used. I’d argue though that in the case of Amazon, wether or not it’s of any priority to them, the suffering would be something worth ironing out over time whereas, for weapons companies, it’s the entire product they sell


  • bestagon@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldVery warm
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yeah but profiting off of starvation, homelessness or sickness is slightly less concerned with destroying human life efficiently, more so extracting value from suffering. Far harder to wiggle your way out of a bomb dropping on you. In that way, defense contractors are especially gross imo. I guess you could argue being blown apart may be more humane though idk












  • bestagon@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldJust checking
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    It exists to cover bank runs and it is your money. There is nothing wrong with wanting your money in any given moment. That’s just my take though, I’m not a lawyer.

    I think it’d basically defeat its preventative purpose though if a story got out that people weren’t covered, even in an engineered bank run. What if you’re not in on the plot? What if it happens tomorrow at your bank? Are you just fucked too? Better withdraw all your money to be safe