

The kid in me hopes its Slackware, but the loser in me hopes its Arch. 😂😂😂
The kid in me hopes its Slackware, but the loser in me hopes its Arch. 😂😂😂
I haven’t seen a USB 2.0 drive in 15 or so years. So I’d say you’re pretty safe… And even if that were the case, it’s still preferable vs hogging the connection for a single file.
USB transfer only affects you with slow speeds until the transfer is done. Network transfer affects the entire party with slow speeds until the transfer is done.
It’s the obvious choice if you’re having saturation issues, even at 2.0 speeds.
I mean, yeah?
NFS is great and all, but it’s not compatible with everything out of the box. Generally, samba is compatible with everything. Linux, Windows, Mac, whatever.
Samba is the obvious choice because it’s compatible with everything out of the box.
I respect it.
Nice! I’ll give it a try.
Her name is: Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI)
Just so you don’t accidentally vote for her.
Here I am just glad I’m not the only one. lol.
This is just outrageously poor advice.
Barring any quirks; for Arch, RHEL, Rocky, Alma, CentOS, Debian, Fedora, Mandrivia, openSUSE, Ubuntu, and Void it’s as simple as installing nvidia-open
. Most other distros its the same, but the package name varies from repository to repository.
I’m torn between this being fucking genius, and a terrible idea all at once.
EDIT: Requires ngx_http_auth_request_module
. * Caddy4lyfe. *
There are two routes. VPN and VPS.
VPN; setup wireguard and offer services to your wireguard network.
VPS; setup a VPS to act as a reverse proxy for your jellyfin instance.
Each have their own perks. Each have their own caveats.
Over WiFi? Pass around physical media. Nothing ruins a LAN party like someone saturating 90% of the connection to transfer ISOs.
If it’s a dedicated file server, with its own network, then the obvious choice is Samba.
It really doesn’t matter how long your media is, it matters the specific conditions you’re changing. Encoding takes time, and it’s outrageously stressful on a CPU. It’s still going to take a long time versus using a GPU.
Debian wins
Testify, brother.
Slackware 3.1 late 1996. Great fuckin’ year that was.
Which is literally why I shit on them, and then you defended them. So which is it? You defending them or shitting on them? Because I’ve never not had an issue with DHL.
These people seem…pretty stupid tbh. Maybe they don’t understand what fail2ban is, or what it does, but you should absolutely use fail2ban. Security is objectively better by just having it enabled than not for any service, not just jellyfin.
Excellent setup. It’s the one I use as well.
I wouldn’t setup fail2ban in a container. Install it on the host system.
This can either be true, or not true. It depends on which distro you go with, IMO. There are linux distros specifically designed for new user experiences, and then there are “basic” distros which don’t do unnecessary hand-holding for those who are used to the *nix desktop experience.
There has never been a better time to try linux.
If you do light computing, then linux is the best case scenario for you. You won’t be changing much about the OS, so not much can go wrong. I installed linux for my 65 year old mother 12 years ago or so, and it’s never had an issue. So frankly, I wouldn’t worry too much about it.
As with all things when it comes to linux, it depends. Some of my favorite games have anti-cheat which has no linux client, so therefore even if you can get the game to work in theory, it won’t function because no anti-cheat.
You would be hard pressed to find something which is windows only these days, but even if you do there are virtualization options like WINE or bottles which simulate a windows environment for the application and force it to run under linux anyways.
Sure.
Generally, most people use the command line for updating the system itself, but a lot of distributions come with a “Microsoft Store” type application to give you a GUI to update your OS and applications.
Linux works off a multi-user environment which lends security to the OS. You have a root user, which is your super administrative user, and then normal user accounts which can be added as “administrators” which can then run commands and edit files/settings which are reserved for administrative accounts.
The security is stronger because we know what’s in it. Security through obscurity is generally frowned upon, even by NIST.
Generally no, but there still are anti-virus available, like ClamWin.
My heart says yes, but my fingers won’t let me type it.
It’s technically possible, but you would have to meet a laundry list of conditions for that to happen.
New users seem to really like Mint. But it’s exceptionally easy to test different distributions, even directly under Windows using Hyper-V. Test a few out and see if you like em.