Do those chuds not realise that states have other sources of revenue?

NATO

Or Soul Reaver.

Under such a system, would I be allowed to build my own home?

In the USSR, for example, people were given plots of land in addition to their homes. Pretty sure that you could opt to build housing there the way you would want. Even if I am incorrect on that last part, a relevant system seems perfectly workable.

Knowing the difference between first-order ethics and second-order ethics, and being generally knowledgeable about the study of ethics doesn’t seem to make one what most people here would consider to be morally good.

Not sure why the other humanities fields are supposed to be relevant in this regard, at least if we separate them from social studies.

cause i’m more christian than they are, literally same claim they make

So, you do not have any more basis for your claims than they do? Considering that, and the fact that they outnumber you by a lot, it seems that they are better candidates for being classified as actual christians.

If your faith consists of hating people, as it’s the lowest form of prayer to hope for misfortune of your enemies, i do think you are full of shit

In that case, christians can be divided into being full of shit and ones who base their beliefs on the claims of the ones who are full of shit but with a few deviations.

if you think colonialism, slavery or genocide wouldn’t happen without christianity

I don’t, but christians and their organisations have been consistent supporters of such. The rest still has their beliefs entirely on the say-so of those (with, again, some deviations).

institution is not religion tho, beliefs are what you make of them

If you claim that every major group that claims to be christian is not actually christian, then what claim do you have to be an actual christian instead of them?
Also, if you consider every such group to not good, then why do you want to base your beliefs on their fiction that they consistently use for horrible stuff that ranges from abuse on a personal level to colonialism, slavery, and genocide?

Going to note that there are people who think that the PRC appeasing the US and siding with them against the USSR was somehow good.

Even fursuits?

Hope and change

So, we are in agreement that NATO and Ukrainian leadership should face justice. Good.

the US tries to quietly interfere

By doing a coup d’etat, replacing the government, and pushing Russia to war. ‘Quietly’.

That’s not exactly a good piece of evidence to say it was a coup

Overthrowing a government in this manner is a coup d’etat.

If enough of the population were on the Russian side the protest numbers would’ve looked very different, that’s not the way the people chose

Oh! I can play this game too!
‘If enough of the population was on the side of trans people, the harassment of trans people wouldn’t be happening. That’s not what the people keep choosing’.
Or how about ‘If enough of the population was on the Jewish side, the Holocaust wouldn’t have happened. That’s not what the people chose’.

I can come up with more examples of ‘the people’ making ‘choices’.

Seems the ‘coup’ in 2014 was caused by mass protests by Ukrainian people

I didn’t know Victoria Nuland and other higher-ups of the USian empire were ‘Ukrainian people’ who were merely protesting. I suppose, you will also consider members of the Ukrainian government who participated in that and organised that as merely ‘Ukrainian people’ ‘protesting’, as well.
By the way, why were they ‘protesting’ purely after the the government opted to not accept a bad deal with the EU, and why were they so fond of Bandera, and why were they picking who will be in what position in the government weeks before the finalisation of the coup?

Damage is more than just war

Ah, so you are just going to try to invent a bullshit reason to demonise the PRC.

In the same way that the US likes to fuck with people’s governments, so does China

The PRC has also not engaged in coups like the ones in Ukraine, Brazil, etc. or invasions like those of Iraq, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan, Palestine, etc., nor has the PRC engaged in the IMF-style debt-entrapment, contrary to the popular myths that your empire likes spreading.
So, no, this ‘so does China’ is unwarranted there.

You are extremely uninformed about these topics.

The US has definitely done damage to my country but you won’t find a war that is US vs Australia

Because Australia is a settler colony in the imperial core.
Also, it’s incredible to present white European Australians as victims in this regard when they are literally colonisers.

Finding specific things for China is a pain

Because the PRC simply hasn’t been doing what you claim it has been doing. Whenever somebody tries to claim that the PRC are these malicious demons, if one looks at actual investigations of such topics, one finds things like ‘The UN finds no evidence of such-and-such’ and ‘We have examined if the PRC engages in debt-trapping and have found that that does not happen’, etc.

General abuse of ocean territory rights

HAHAHAHA.
Gods forbid the PRC has agency in its waters.

general human rights abuses

Oh, not any specific ones, just vague ‘general’ ones that you can’t point to? Meanwhile, when Australia invades everywhere with its NATO buddies, it’s all fine and dandy to inflict the worst abuse on people there, including kidnapping and torturing people, I take it?
The PRC has been one of the few places on this planet to improve people’s standards of living in the past couple of decades or so.

with sweatshops

Ah yes, a white European coloniser is going to complain about their (former) colonies being forced to have worse living conditions than what labour aristocracy at home enjoys.
Meanwhile, your empire literally has child labour.
Not to mention that this ‘sweatshop’ thing is likely yet another myth meant to demonise the PRC, but I haven’t looked into it myself, as your empire seems to have stopped making those accusations a while ago. Probably because nobody with a brain is buying those anymore.

along with the excessive control of the people

Oh no, not the vague ‘excessive control of the people’. This is totally so much worse than white European Australians invading everywhere and torturing people. /s

Releasing CFCs again, like we got rid of that shit for a reason if they could stop pumping it out that would be fantastic

You mean the thing that was being made there illegally? And which the government cracked down on?

‘Tankie’ actually means ‘a person who is correct’.

Crimea first

The Crimeans wanted Crimea to be a part of Russia and not aligned with NATO, as evidenced by stuff like attempted secession from Ukraine in the 90s, anti-NATO protests in 2000s, polls conducted by NATO organisations before and after the referendum.

It’s very clear that the war was started by Russia

TIL that Russia did the pro-NATO Banderite coup in 2014 and told the new Ukrainian government to attempt to become NATO’s forward outpost for some reason.

and it isn’t the first second or I think even third time they’ve invaded Ukraine

It is, in fact, the first time that the Russian Federation engages in warfare with Ukraine.
But hey, care to name any dates that you had in mind?

China is… an interesting case. They’ve certainly done a lot of damage

The PRC hasn’t engaged in warfare since more than 40 years ago.
Also, ‘damage done’ to whom?

I would like to know what the contradiction is.
You can redirect me to a source if you have such ready - I should be able to study it on my own.

Given that the game frames the Polish invasion of Ukraine and Belarus as somehow a good thing and Poland as not the aggressor, that’s definitely the target audience.

its even inherently self-contradictory: if it’s a point particle (zero physical size) then it ought to have infinite density and thus be a small black hole

There doesn’t seem to be any self-contradiction there, given that such density distributions are modeled just fine with generalised functions such as Dirac’s delta function.

However, the explanation from the copypasta does not seem correct, either, given what one learns in introduction to chemistry, but I am not an expert on this topic.

Data visualisation is my passion