I assume Nahida refers to this post https://burggit.moe/post/89839
It’s not marked on pixiv as AI and it has multiple images that look more like regular layering than AI variation https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/102192645
Uoh 😭
I assume Nahida refers to this post https://burggit.moe/post/89839
It’s not marked on pixiv as AI and it has multiple images that look more like regular layering than AI variation https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/102192645
It’s AI art, from here https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/104804026
I can do that since the sidebar is basically the same coding as a comment.
I’m not sure exactly how much customization is doable with a lemmy instance but it would certainly liven this place up
I can change the display name, banner/profile image, and what the sidebar says. Other than that there’s no customization towards how it looks.
The tankoubon is Mashumarori (Marshmallow + Loli) , but this individual chapter is Caramel Loli
I thought about putting them there, but they don’t restrict people to making right only topics. It’s just that the crazies are more inclined to join that kind of place.
Don’t forget to put the author or (N/A) if you don’t know.
Yeah back in 2019.
Countries responded and I don’t think it went anywhere.
Here’s the US response
In the United States, federal law provides that it is illegal to create, possess, or distribute a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture or painting, that depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct and is obscene. However, visual depictions (CGI, anime, etc.) where there is not a “real” child are typically protected by the First Amendment (unless the visual depictions are obscene)
Japan
Japan therefore proposes to exclude “audio representations” and “written or printed materials” from the third sentence of paragraph 61. "Furthermore, for the reasons explained above, whether criminal penalties should be imposed, even if the case involves pornography of a non-existent child, it needs to be carefully considered. Japan proposes to add “to the extent that it represents an existing child” at the end of paragraph 61.
Somehow this inspired me to whip this up real quick.
I’ve got multiple accounts for different instances, but this is my main one just because they allow me to post content 99% of the other instances really don’t want to deal with.
All me.
For something like this you can just do [G-L].
Well that depends on if they’re going to defederate with burggit.moe (which they haven’t done so far) or if their policy is just applying to local communities on their instance.
That’s more alternating view points than multiple characters. It’s basically 3 separate images just combined. If they interact with each other like clones, then yeah you can use the group tag.
Sadly I can’t change anything in the create post section. And yeah you can’t filter based on tags (though in specific circumstances you can), but you never know what the future holds so maybe it’ll be implemented in the future.
https://fba.ryona.agency/?domain=burggit.moe for here specifically
https://fba.ryona.agency/ to see other places.
I did stipulate that if you don’t know the author you can write (N/A). I did put what each letter means on the sidebar with what the title should look like.
I’ve always viewed futanari as someone with male (optional balls) and female genitals (secondary sex characteristics optional (breasts)) kinda like the pixiv definition so that’s just how I’m describing it. Usually something like you described is called “dickgirl”, but I’ll say that works for futanari as long as it’s obviously not just a male.
Yeah I messaged the creator to add them in. I’m pretty lenient on title rules so I like to message instead of delete right away since titles can be easily edited. If it gets reported I’ll remove then messsage though.