Most performance optimisation can be done through improving algorithms and data structures, and knowing well the language you’re using.

I don’t think I’ve encountered any performance issue that wasn’t either:

• Unavoidable because of what I’m doing
• Coming from an inefficient data structure or algorithm
• Coming from a bad use or pitfall of the language.

Of course there are specific cases such as low-power environments and such, but that’s not what most people talk about when they talk about performance.

I also would like to point out my confusion with the obsession towards performance when it’s not needed (such as “is languageA 10% faster than languageB?”) but then everyone putting web technologies everywhere, from games to desktop software. It’s starting to feel like performance is more of a cult than a pragmatic question at this point.

I’m still not decided on which is worse, Picard or Enterprise. But I’d probably choose Picard.

You actually think that you’re the only Lemmy user who is “like you” and that everyone else here is a communist?

Talk about a persecution complex.

You don’t question the shit you say when the only upvote you get out of almost a hundred people is yours?

Everyone*

Je vais pas pleurer.

Bah ils sont “centristes” et soutiennent Macron donc bon, je comprends la qualification.

Step 1: don’t do it

I don’t know who they are talking about, I don’t need to.

And mentioning “legal” doesn’t bring anything to the point of the post, it’s just a side effect of the person’s opinions

But the wording implies that the legality of this person’s situation matters for the rest of the sentence, either meaning that being illegal would justify deportation, or not being able to come back after being arrested without reason.

Why say legally if it changes nothing, then?

I like how this still implies that it’s only wrong because he had a legal situation.

After all illegal immigrants are not really human, right?

Nan mais faut arrêter, LePen c’est rien, elle reste modérée surtout quand on la compare aux extrêmes dures genre Mélanchon hein.

(/s au cas où)

It’s the opposite, it would be 1/300 L/person/day, or 1L per 300 persons

“Je suis pas facho, mais je pense que condamner les criminels fachos est un acte politique. Bien sûr, les criminels pas fachos doivent être arrêtés, cette bande de terroristes”

“Why do people call their government right wing despite not having slavery?”

Since when is the lack of healthcare the norm, and healthcare the “leftist anomaly”?

The US really made the world so much worse, it’s crazy.

C’est rigolo mais quel est le but ?

Yeah, if he’s only motivated by bad reasons, fuck him.

He can do something that is ultimately better, and still be doing it for reasons wrong enough to be criticised. I don’t understand the point of defending an immoral megalomaniac just because he’s trying at the last second to look like he’s on the good side after fighting for the bad one for a long time.

Until now his stance was to say that supporting Palestine is antisemitic.

I’m sure he’s saying that in good faith. /s

Mais du coup c’est antisémite, ou alors c’est juste quand c’est des gauchistes ?