

Because they’re superior in almost every way and that capitalists don’t actually like competition? Could that be it?


Because they’re superior in almost every way and that capitalists don’t actually like competition? Could that be it?


Well, there you go. A journal that speaks for British millionaires.


Capitalism is as capitalism does.


Didn’t Lenin have something quite apt to say about the Economist?


I think you should do more to ask yourself why western media is silent on this. You don’t have to agree with everything Russia does, but you owe it to yourself to know why apparently this is kept from us.


Oh my bad, I just woke up from a nap and thought this quote was from WWII for a second. Now it all makes sense lmao


Isn’t this a bad example since the Soviet Army went on to win the war and the world was objectively better for it?
If you’re arguing for peace in Ukraine you couldn’t pick a worse historical parallel.


Well, intelligence agencies engage in propaganda too and propaganda doesn’t have to be true to be effective.


Yet more proof Bellingcat is a front for intelligence agencies.

What no material analysis does to a motherfucker. Oppressors are responsible for the conditions they create as well as the revolts that materialize as a result.
I guess this chud thinks slavery would have been abolished quicker if the slaves did more to befriend their slave drivers. In the end this is just a pro-oppression argument whether he intends it to be or not.


You don’t get to claim third party votes just because you believe the Democrats are similar to the Greens or PSL. That’s not how democracy works, much less your precious dictatorship of the bourgeoisie.
If winning the election rests on people outside your base maybe you should do a better job courting them if in fact these parties are so damn similar, which I categorically reject.
Not that winning an election in a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie means much anyway.


Maybe my sense of humor is disturbing, but I live for this slop. It’s hilariously bad.


From what I understand Marxism makes no active distinction between personal and private property. It’s just that toothbrushes and other personal items aren’t considered “property” in the first place.
They’re not relevant to our understanding of property nor the economic relations we want to change. Have your toothbrush. It’s fine.


Alternatively, don’t vote for genocide at all.
By “leftism” they merely mean the liberal wing of capital, not actual communism.


This angle where US imperialism can only be explained as a distraction from the Epstein files is quickly becoming boring and bordering on denial. America isn’t forced into wars by anyone nor a victim of its own imperialism.
No, imperialism is the lifeblood of America, its bread and butter.
Except that’s granting the narrative that this was in fact self-defense. The fact you’re not questioning America’s framing on this reveals you’re not as neutral as your words suggest.
What a joke