I can feel the FOMO, but what makes me afraid is: “What if this isn’t FOMO?”

But to be honest, it’s hard to see the real benefit in the tool when you look on all the “broken” parts along the way.

I’m not an expert in Game Dev, but I can see “good” code and “bad” code.

And yet, I can’t see the meaningful benefit, I can see the cracks, it’s never “fully” there, it’s always a couple details that aren’t correct in the planing, it’s always something that bothers, or some misleading thing that looks “ok”, but when you think little bit more it’s not trully correct.

I know that on the empirical knowledge and testing I’m not seeing this benefit and speed.

But for some reason people are claiming that. And it feels like I’m left behind.

Even if the real number is a 10% speed boost, I want to know where and how to apply this to benefit from this tools. It’s the same as the LSP, people can complain about it, and be like DHH that says that LSP aren’t worth it. But on my own usage it’s a good tool to add on my set of tooling.

Sadly, unless you are on the viral side of the open source, all labour of love can and will be used in private for big corp gains, and this I think it’s unfair. But as the author of the text express, “fuck it” you did something expect nothing in return.

This is a very sad contradiction that I see in the market right now. The pile of work, the endless list of “Backlog” on the board that never ended, and still firing 8k people because “AI” is doing the work. If the AI is a multiplier of 100x, the backlog could be cleaned before throwing everyone under the bus.

I was expecting the discussion, and the traffic on the blog is mostly irrelevant. But I like to write to organize my own thoughts, and use this as a starting point on the conversation, but feels like I string a bad cord doing this. So I ask you, was this a bad action?

Never thought on the integration with the fedi on this level. But considering that this is a “static” page I don’t even know if I want to push this on the client side.

Also, thanks for the show of faith. I just wanted to discuss the topic with the perspective of people using the game engine, and AI tooling, (local or not), effects benefits and such.

That’s a very valida argument that I completed missed in the discussion. Fair point.

I don’t get it.
You mean because I added in multiple communities?
Or because this is the second post in the Fuck AI from my blog?

Well I can always point to English isn’t my native tongue, so I can always infer stuff that isn’t there :D

Still, the way it explain give the idea of something that I can’t see it. And this is what is concerning me for the last week at least.

That was a fair response. But I get the feeling that a lot of “intelligence” is given in this tool. Feels like they are seeing something that I’m not.

If I may ask, why not neovim instead of this?
Or maybe one of the flavors of neovim distros?

I didn’t hat the opportunity to write on this comment yesterday, so I’ll do it today. Freaking awesome idea. Right now when I need to make some more “complex” logic for the AI, I’m using the singleton for the CombatManager to keep it with its data. But having a resource for the combat_context would solve and make it able to have more isolated, and for sure create even a replicable combat (since each turn is “predictable”)… Love it. Thanks for the comment.

Aren’t you the philosopher? Think about it.

I can give you context if you need, but I’m sure you are smart enough to “think for yourself”

With arguments the whole “ai love” fall to the ground

You can’t see because you don’t know enough on the topic.

“for the topic that I’m not expert, AI is always right”

This looks like a lie to yourself

Read about “the third place”

Often this isn’t enough. They protect but aren’t perfect, and on the lower tiers they have “good AÍ/scrappers” which are allowed to pass.

on my servers in very aggressive on his hard I block then. And even so there is still many many bots that pass.

Funny that I saw this post in two different spaces by two different users. Proving that even on the “little guy case” needs to use dark patterns…