Ahh. See, I thought it was a person that has to make a new sock puppet account every time they get banned because they can’t discuss a topic without resorting to childish insults.

Aaahhh. Right. The internet. That place where people get upset over things people say in response to other people, to the point that they resort to ad hominem insults.

Right. Yeah. That place. Totally not a bar. I guess you told me!

From your own article:

“In France, where the terms originated, the left has been called “the party of movement” or liberal”

And since “liberal” is synonymous with democrats…

The left are democrats.

This was fun!

The fuck are you talking about? Wook? I’ve no idea what that even is. And I wasn’t even talking to you.

There’s a third option:

You can stop making politics part of your identity. Who we are may be in part what believe, but we are not at all the sum of what others think.

Walk on your own and stop giving a shit what a bunch of edgelord high-school kids think. There’s a good chance most- if not all of them are going to grow out of it and look back on this shit and cringe. Don’t be a casualty of their stupidity.

Be you.

Ban evading is still against instance rules whether you like it or not. If you don’t, maybe it’s you that should leave.

Every time I get loud about it I get banned from Reddit or Facebook or Lemmy.world

This implies you’ve been banned from all three.

Hey look! It’s Universal Monk, showing up in a .world community. Pretty bold move dude.

So wait, are you admitting that you are ban evading?

You’ve had 2 comments removed for advocating violence, and a slap-on-the-wrist temp ban from an obnoxious automated bot in a troll community.

No meaningful bans.

It’s fucking hilarious how you all try to change the meaning of “the left.”

The left has always been the Democratic Party, bud. And while it can be inclusive to other sociological and political ideologies, at its core, the democrats have been at its epicenter.

Maybe look up when the term originated from?

To me, all attempts to co-opt the term appear to only be accepted by those that like to misuse it, constantly.

Ahh… personal attacks now?

It’s not a case in point against me. It’s makes my point. Rittenhouse was guilty and walked because the case against him couldn’t be proven.

I said- if Luigi did it- he should rot in prison. If he didn’t he shouldn’t.

This had nothing to do with whether or not a case could be proven against him. It had to do with how it SHOULD be. Fucking christ! I didn’t think I needed to explain this.

If he did it- it should be provable if there’s evidence. If so, rot in jail as a murderer.

If he didn’t- he’s not specifically found innocent, he’s just found not guilty… and he should walk.

For fuck’s sake….

Internet lawyers are the fucking worst!

Is that so, Ma?

Well, considering that a Time Machine is out of the question, and the military- who happens to be capable of using satellites in space to turn every single one of you into a pink mist without even scratching the paint on your neighbors car- is not on your side, I’d say your only option is through diplomacy.

Because face it- America fucked up.

This was all avoidable back in November. There was the chance to overcome this problem- no… to avoid it all-together. But too many chose not to. They chose to make a statement. And now, sadly- everyone suffers for it. That’s it. The end.

If it helps- let’s look at it this way:

Let’s say you committed a crime¹. You are caught, and have been found guilty² Your penance, is prison³. Now, while in prison, you can plan to escape⁴, but you know that won’t work, it’s impossible, and if it were, it would only be so for someone smart enough to pull it off. That you commuted the crime and got caught, illustrates that you are not.

You’re not getting out. Plain and simple.

Now optionally, you can just sit there and stew in the colossal failure that caused you to be in there to begin with and work towards learning from your mistakes so that if/when you are released, you can do better⁵- or you can work with your lawyer(s) on your options to have your sentence overturned⁶.

Those are your options.

In this scenario:

• ¹ - didn’t vote against Trump
• ² - Trump gets elected
• ³ - Trump’s term
• ⁴ - Proposed armed uprising attempt
• ⁵ - Pay attention and be an informed voter
• ⁶ - Be active in local politics. Help in any way you are able to help move the states motions to impeach when the time comes. Work with local groups to petition state reps to act on his crimes.

It’s this or nothing.

Because if you think you have the organization, tactical knowledge, technical functionality, manpower, and arms to overcome the most powerful military on the planet, I would say go right ahead and try-

But know that in doing so- you’re gong to get a LOT of innocent people killed. It’ll be a fucking bloodbath.

And in the end, whoever remains- gets trump for life.

Lastly, do not mistake my suggesting that nothing can be done as a willingness to do nothing about it. Some people sit in prison, knowing they fucked up. They’re not giving in. They’re just quietly having the balls it takes to know they royally fucked it, and working towards understanding how they can avoid a repeat scenario.

Being a realist is not a weakness. Not is it being compliant. It’s simply accepting a circumstance that is out of one’s control.

And for the record, peaceful protest is provenly more effective than violence. Reference:

Here
Here
Here
Here

So from-

We don’t decide who’s guilty or not based on how we feel about the victim.

Your take is that I’m Rittenhouse.

LOL…

IF HE DID IT, HE SHOULD ROT. IF HE DIDN’T, HE SHOULD WALK.

Does every concept of every idea need to be explained around here? It’s a given in the above statement that if he can’t be found guilty- he should walk. Why does this need to be argued?

My fucking god people need everything spelled out around here. For fuck’s sake.

Either way it doesn’t matter. If he did it, he should rot. If he didn’t- He should walk.

Why is this difficult for you to understand.

I love how people can’t debate without writing lines for their opponent. It has the added benefit of making it easier to just tag them as a waste of time.

If you want to discuss this, I get to say my part in this- not you.

Yeah…. This one hurts a bit, but I thank you for it.

What the fuck is Theodore?