RamrodBaguette [comrade/them, he/him]

  • 110 Posts
  • 593 Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 21st, 2020

help-circle






  • By the time of the second world war’s start, Germany had effectively been able to secure its own autarky (war loot and occupied territories factored in) and wage war independently of Western support for a good few years, though it certainly accepted outside help in some regards (like IBM, as you mentioned). Even before, while it certainly did help, Germany didn’t need material and diplomatic support from the Western Allies to incorporate Austria and Czechoslovakia (thereby giving them the industry to support themselves), only their inaction.

    By contrast, Israel’s existence while at war is entirely predicated on Western support. Without it, it would need to mobilize its entire infrastructure, population and industry towards war, which would absolutely kill it as a viable project within a matter of years. The genocide in Gaza and displacement in West Bank and East Jerusalem is effectively as much of a Western undertaking as it is an Israeli one. It’s the same beast with two different faces.

    I don’t mean to belittle the evil of mask-off Zionism or fascism, just that its soulless liberal PR team which gaslights all while making a mockery of the very concept of internationalism gets under my skin more often.


  • I hate these rabid ethnonationalist quasi-zealots but I hate the Western liberal “democracies” and their institutions who enable them in the first place so, so much more. They will parrot their utopic aspiration of a law-abiding community of secular democratic states prizing the value of individual rights above “the nation” only to then read shit like “The Bible offers three modalities for a religiously mandated war” and entertain it. Blood-and-soil “nation-building” ramblings with religious justification were bad when the Serbs were the ones spewing them but are perfectly valid for the only democracy in the middle east.










  • The “Iranian Pro-Democracy Movement” (ie, the English-speaking ones who Libs actually listen to) is funny because if you bring up Mossadegh as opposed to some failson “prince” as an actual historical figure to rally behind, they go onto some tirade about him being a crypto-commie dictator who deserved to be overthrown by Ajax “the Iranian people”. Westoids love that shit because it absolves them of the fact that “the good guys” essentially strangled a US-friendly liberal democracy in its cradle and set Iran on the path to become what it is now all because of Britbong oil interests.





  • If you have a good-ish rig (as it’s poorly optimized) and the patience for some annoying bugs, it’s very good. The devs poured their everything into making London feel like a varied and dense place with its own identity separate from the Commonwealth, some underlying similarities notwithstanding (eg. no FEV means no supermutants but you still have loads of ghouls and raiders hooligans to kill), and it expands on visual story-telling that Beth Fallout games are actually good at. Aside from that, the quests are better (even if they sometimes fall into the vanilla shoot-n-loot formula), there are a lot of skill/perk checks in dialogue and I also quite like the companion roster and their unique quests. YMMV on some of the goofier factions (one of them are raiders who LARP as 18th century British sailors) but I personally like Fallout when it embraces some absurdity.

    That being said, I wouldn’t quite say it’s Fallout 4’s New Vegas like some have. It still has some fundamental flaws, some of which are actually worse than vanilla F4, like the main quest’s handling of the faction conflict. Also the settlement system is still an unfinished mess and some of the original game bleeds through there.

    There are planned updates which will include stuff for the main quest and even some “DLC” so who knows how much better it will get?