They sometimes hang out at the disc golf course in Golden gate park I frequent. I like to think they’re curious about the discs and think they’re some wierd bird we tamed. It’s easy to hear them but there hard to spot in the high eucalyptus and cypress trees. Glad to see there population is increasing.
Here’s a very blurry picture I got of one a month ago:
The guy makes shitty posts (literally he seems to have some scatological obsession) no one likes them and then he complains that he’s being suppressed.
He’s been doing it for a while now, before Elon took over he blamed it on his right wing views being suppressed, and Elon took that at face value and took up his cause as one of the reasons to buy Twitter.
Now I guess he’s coming up with a new conspiracy that everyone is getting suppressed. In reality it’s probably that people are just disengaging from Twitter and there is less views / engagement to go around.
And there stocks price went up 7% today …
If anyone still needs proof that financial speculation and stock valuations are as real as fairies, here you go.
They turned off there nuclear after Fukushima, fossil fuels have always been expensive for them so solar makes a lot of sense.
Wouldn’t call carney and the liberals lefty, there centrists. The left NDP party under Singh has been losing ground as people have ben rallying around the liberals to make sure the conservatives don’t win.
Still would probably piss off trump and his crew. They just probably won’t get much progress, but considering the direction of a lot of other western countries not backsliding into fascism is pretty good.
Sorry for the English, just thought I’d add some context from the u.s.
The term started off in African American culture to mean being socially conscious and aware of systemic racism, sexism etc. It then started to be used by mainstream progressive culture especially on twitter. Then the right wing started to use it as a derogatory term for all the recent social progress that scared them. Now progressives have stopped using it as much while the right has made it a core of there platform to “stop the woke agenda” which sounds a lot better then “let’s go back to being racist, sexist, and homophobic”. Sad to hear the derogatory form has been exported to Germany
Heavy metal af
And marx had some fucked up opinions on jews and homosexuals, along with a lot of others in the “Marxist canon” that doesn’t mean we throw out the entire ideology because the founder had ideas of race and gender that most people believed before the last century.
The reality is most people who are Christians, like Marxists, haven’t read every single book and letter and believe everything that was written. They take the core concepts and apply them to the modern world.
Even the bigoted Christians aren’t really orthodox, they aren’t following the part that says you shouldn’t do usury, they’re just bigots looking for a justification for there bigotry. They just Google the verse in the Bible that says gays are bad, just like the small minority of homophobic Marxists will pull up a marx or stalin quote against it.
Religion is a tool, often used by reactionary forces, but has been effectively used by liberation theologians to challenge capital in Latin America.
Tradwife content is on the rise for women as well, more and more young people are buying into this mythical simpler past as the world gets more complex, alienating and difficult.
The tension between a capitalist wanting lower wages and more consumption is a contradiction at the heart of capitalism. It’s one of the reasons Marx thought it was bound to destroy itself. One resolution to this contradiction is debt, get people buying everything on credit cards and you won’t have to raise wages to keep consumption up. This is why the economy has kept growing while wages have stagnated, credit card debt has boomed recently.
There are many contradictions in capitalism, another is that workers want higher wages, but also want cheaper products. If wages do increase then the price of products increase as well and we get inflation. These contradictions lead to the instability of capitalism and require the state to step in and mediate them otherwise the system oscillates wildly between booms, busts, inflation, deflation etc.
Sorry to hear about your situation. I understand how that sort of rhetoric can kick you while your down and stick with you a lot more. Blaming poverty on the impoverished is always disgusting.
I agree, some family situations are shit and any post-capitalist society would have to provide the resources to leave those situations.
The idea that people SHOULD leave there parents home at 18 is consumptively motivated, the idea that people CAN leave there parents home at 18 is liberating
Consumption is necessary for capitalism, the way you accumulate wealth is by selling goods and services for profit. Many recessions are caused by production overshooting consumption which leads to people being fired to lower production, which lowers consumption… Most of the evaluation of companies and thus the wealth of billionaires is based on consumption increasing. If it were to ever go down in a meaningful way then production would to, and thus the GDP and the billionaires slice of it.
There are other forms of accumulation besides the capitalist mode, eg. Fighting and conquering your neighbors in a feudal system, but I don’t think musk and bezos want to bet there fortunes on there military acumen and they probably prefer this current system.
I think the whole avocado toast thing was way overblown. It was maybe one cnbc article and a cable news segment but the memes and media against it far outnumber the articles that supported it.
I’ve seen far more media supporting consumption of avocado toast, both social media and advertising, then media telling you to stop consuming avocado toast. We have just gotten so used to “tuning” out advertising that we don’t notice it, meanwhile an article shaming you for consuming is far more likely to get a reaction and make you remember it.
Banning advertising would be a good start.
This requires a cultural change. Even if we fully redistribute the wealth, if everyone uses there new money to buy a huge pickup truck then we aren’t helping to make a sustainable system.
Changing the culture is going to require some carrots and sticks.
The carrot is showing how you can enjoy life without consumption. People in the west have been indoctrinated by advertising and other cultural forces to think the path of happiness lies through consumption. Banning advertising and having media show paths to happiness that are less consumptive can help with this. Social media can play a part in this by showing people enjoying life withiut needing to buy anything, eg. Posting a pciture of your friends hanging out in the park. Celebrating a low consumption lifestyle can direct peoples drive for happiness away from consumption towards less destructive pursuits.
The stick, which most people don’t want to do, is shame. Christianity was able to channel people’s sexual drive into monogamous heterosexual married relationships for centuries using shame. If it’s able to control such a fundamental desire as sex, it can stop people from buying useless junk. This will have to wait until the culture gains majority, because a minority shaming a majority just results in the minority being ostracized.
For anyone asking why it’s strange, from the article
Traditionally, the dollar would strengthen as tariffs sink demand for foreign products.
If you’re looking at the dollar with supply and demand, if international trade to the u.s. decreases with tarriffs, then the amount of dollars leaving the u.s. also decreases and thus the supply of dollars on the international market. Assuming demand remains constant then the strength of the dollar should go up.
For this decrease in strength you have to look to demand which has to decrease enough to counteract the tarriffs plus more. This decrease in demand is coming from both decrease in demand for assets priced in dollars (u.s. companies stocks, treasury bonds, real estate etc.) And retaliatory tarriffs which lower demand for u.s. goods.
Anytime anyone suggests we need to decrease consumption people complain that it’s a plot by the rich to get us used to poverty.
we should eat less meat
The elites are trying to make the poor eat bugs
we need to drive less
The rich are taking away our freedom
we need to live in denser housing
The rich are trying to force you into a shoe box
You know what the rich really want?, consumption. They want you buying as much as possible because that’s the way we get growth and it also makes it so you have less savings and are more dependent on your job, and less likely to make demands or quit.
I agree we need massive wealth redistribution and consumption by the 1% is magnitudes more harmful then the rest. But the current american lifestyle of heating and cooling an entire house for 1-2 people in a sprawled out suburb where you have to drive everywhere and have meat with every meal is not sustainable either. We need to reprioritize what we value as a society, deemphasizing individuality and private ownership and moving towards community.
Studies show hyper individualistic capitalist society is dissolving all social relations and making us lonelier and more alienated
Incels: well it’s worse for men so we should focus on them
Femcels: well if it is worse then it’s there fault for being misogynist
… culture war continues, nothing gets solved…
An example of this was the communist were heavily involved in organizing share croppers in the Jim crow south. This caused a lot of red baiting during the civil rights movement, with MLK often being labeled a communist ( he was definitely more left then he is often portrayed, radical by today’s standards, but not a commie).
?
Stalingrad was renamed to volgagrad after de-stalinization. Leningrad was the name of st. Petersburg during the soviet era. Was there another city that got a name change?
Robots don’t get drunk, or distracted, or text, or speed…
Anecdotally, I think the Waymos are more courteous than human drivers. Though waymo seems to be the best ones out so far, idk about the other services.
Just going through the wikipedia and a lot of health organizations still recommend reducing saturated fat including the WHO, the American Heart Association, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, the British Dietetic Association, the World Heart Federation, the British National Health Service. These organizations are run by health professionals, not politicians with some vague anti-fat agenda.
Here’s a study going over some meta analysis and finding that
It goes on to say that there is less evidence for fat in general to cause cardiovascular disease and mortality, but saturated fat and trans fats definitely do.