• 2 Posts
  • 199 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 30th, 2025

help-circle

  • Just going through the wikipedia and a lot of health organizations still recommend reducing saturated fat including the WHO, the American Heart Association, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, the British Dietetic Association, the World Heart Federation, the British National Health Service. These organizations are run by health professionals, not politicians with some vague anti-fat agenda.

    Here’s a study going over some meta analysis and finding that

    Saturated fat was associated with an 8% increase and trans fats; a 13% increase in total mortality compared with carbohydrate. Thus, replacing 5% of energy from saturated fats with equivalent energy from PUFA ( polyunsaturated fat) and MUFA ( monounsaturated fat ) was associated with estimated reductions in total mortality of 27% and 13%, respectively

    It goes on to say that there is less evidence for fat in general to cause cardiovascular disease and mortality, but saturated fat and trans fats definitely do.



  • The guy makes shitty posts (literally he seems to have some scatological obsession) no one likes them and then he complains that he’s being suppressed.

    He’s been doing it for a while now, before Elon took over he blamed it on his right wing views being suppressed, and Elon took that at face value and took up his cause as one of the reasons to buy Twitter.

    Now I guess he’s coming up with a new conspiracy that everyone is getting suppressed. In reality it’s probably that people are just disengaging from Twitter and there is less views / engagement to go around.





  • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoich_iel@feddit.orgich_iel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    Sorry for the English, just thought I’d add some context from the u.s.

    The term started off in African American culture to mean being socially conscious and aware of systemic racism, sexism etc. It then started to be used by mainstream progressive culture especially on twitter. Then the right wing started to use it as a derogatory term for all the recent social progress that scared them. Now progressives have stopped using it as much while the right has made it a core of there platform to “stop the woke agenda” which sounds a lot better then “let’s go back to being racist, sexist, and homophobic”. Sad to hear the derogatory form has been exported to Germany



  • And marx had some fucked up opinions on jews and homosexuals, along with a lot of others in the “Marxist canon” that doesn’t mean we throw out the entire ideology because the founder had ideas of race and gender that most people believed before the last century.

    The reality is most people who are Christians, like Marxists, haven’t read every single book and letter and believe everything that was written. They take the core concepts and apply them to the modern world.

    Even the bigoted Christians aren’t really orthodox, they aren’t following the part that says you shouldn’t do usury, they’re just bigots looking for a justification for there bigotry. They just Google the verse in the Bible that says gays are bad, just like the small minority of homophobic Marxists will pull up a marx or stalin quote against it.

    Religion is a tool, often used by reactionary forces, but has been effectively used by liberation theologians to challenge capital in Latin America.



  • The tension between a capitalist wanting lower wages and more consumption is a contradiction at the heart of capitalism. It’s one of the reasons Marx thought it was bound to destroy itself. One resolution to this contradiction is debt, get people buying everything on credit cards and you won’t have to raise wages to keep consumption up. This is why the economy has kept growing while wages have stagnated, credit card debt has boomed recently.

    There are many contradictions in capitalism, another is that workers want higher wages, but also want cheaper products. If wages do increase then the price of products increase as well and we get inflation. These contradictions lead to the instability of capitalism and require the state to step in and mediate them otherwise the system oscillates wildly between booms, busts, inflation, deflation etc.

    Sorry to hear about your situation. I understand how that sort of rhetoric can kick you while your down and stick with you a lot more. Blaming poverty on the impoverished is always disgusting.



  • Consumption is necessary for capitalism, the way you accumulate wealth is by selling goods and services for profit. Many recessions are caused by production overshooting consumption which leads to people being fired to lower production, which lowers consumption… Most of the evaluation of companies and thus the wealth of billionaires is based on consumption increasing. If it were to ever go down in a meaningful way then production would to, and thus the GDP and the billionaires slice of it.

    There are other forms of accumulation besides the capitalist mode, eg. Fighting and conquering your neighbors in a feudal system, but I don’t think musk and bezos want to bet there fortunes on there military acumen and they probably prefer this current system.

    I think the whole avocado toast thing was way overblown. It was maybe one cnbc article and a cable news segment but the memes and media against it far outnumber the articles that supported it.

    I’ve seen far more media supporting consumption of avocado toast, both social media and advertising, then media telling you to stop consuming avocado toast. We have just gotten so used to “tuning” out advertising that we don’t notice it, meanwhile an article shaming you for consuming is far more likely to get a reaction and make you remember it.


  • Banning advertising would be a good start.

    This requires a cultural change. Even if we fully redistribute the wealth, if everyone uses there new money to buy a huge pickup truck then we aren’t helping to make a sustainable system.

    Changing the culture is going to require some carrots and sticks.

    The carrot is showing how you can enjoy life without consumption. People in the west have been indoctrinated by advertising and other cultural forces to think the path of happiness lies through consumption. Banning advertising and having media show paths to happiness that are less consumptive can help with this. Social media can play a part in this by showing people enjoying life withiut needing to buy anything, eg. Posting a pciture of your friends hanging out in the park. Celebrating a low consumption lifestyle can direct peoples drive for happiness away from consumption towards less destructive pursuits.

    The stick, which most people don’t want to do, is shame. Christianity was able to channel people’s sexual drive into monogamous heterosexual married relationships for centuries using shame. If it’s able to control such a fundamental desire as sex, it can stop people from buying useless junk. This will have to wait until the culture gains majority, because a minority shaming a majority just results in the minority being ostracized.


  • For anyone asking why it’s strange, from the article

    Traditionally, the dollar would strengthen as tariffs sink demand for foreign products.

    If you’re looking at the dollar with supply and demand, if international trade to the u.s. decreases with tarriffs, then the amount of dollars leaving the u.s. also decreases and thus the supply of dollars on the international market. Assuming demand remains constant then the strength of the dollar should go up.

    For this decrease in strength you have to look to demand which has to decrease enough to counteract the tarriffs plus more. This decrease in demand is coming from both decrease in demand for assets priced in dollars (u.s. companies stocks, treasury bonds, real estate etc.) And retaliatory tarriffs which lower demand for u.s. goods.


  • Anytime anyone suggests we need to decrease consumption people complain that it’s a plot by the rich to get us used to poverty.

    we should eat less meat

    The elites are trying to make the poor eat bugs

    we need to drive less

    The rich are taking away our freedom

    we need to live in denser housing

    The rich are trying to force you into a shoe box

    You know what the rich really want?, consumption. They want you buying as much as possible because that’s the way we get growth and it also makes it so you have less savings and are more dependent on your job, and less likely to make demands or quit.

    I agree we need massive wealth redistribution and consumption by the 1% is magnitudes more harmful then the rest. But the current american lifestyle of heating and cooling an entire house for 1-2 people in a sprawled out suburb where you have to drive everywhere and have meat with every meal is not sustainable either. We need to reprioritize what we value as a society, deemphasizing individuality and private ownership and moving towards community.


  • Studies show hyper individualistic capitalist society is dissolving all social relations and making us lonelier and more alienated

    Incels: well it’s worse for men so we should focus on them

    Femcels: well if it is worse then it’s there fault for being misogynist

    … culture war continues, nothing gets solved…