Cryptography nerd
Fediverse accounts;
Natanael@slrpnk.net (main)
Natanael@infosec.pub
Natanael@lemmy.zip
Lemmy moderation account: @TrustedThirdParty@infosec.pub - !crypto@infosec.pub
@Natanael_L@mastodon.social
Bluesky: natanael.bsky.social
On the cryptography forum(s) I run my rule is that all use of LLM/AI must be declared, including the prompt.
Wouldn’t mind banning it completely, but I think it’s better to not discourage people who are genuinely trying to learn, while getting an opportunity to show them where LLM will go wrong.
If the point about teaching doesn’t apply to your forum (like one about memes), I don’t see the usefulness of a disclosure rule and thus you might as well ban it completely.
Recently mocked the tariffs
Even humans can absorb oxygen through the intestines
Only tastes ok
To do that you must first make sure it’s opened via your instance so it has it cached.
It doesn’t get served to all, but it has to be served to a relay which in turn is reachable by all.
While there is a firehose service which publishes all events as they happen, only services built on watching those needs to receive all (moderation services, etc). Everybody else gets a view already filtered and composed by services earlier in line. See jetstream as an existing optimization already delivered by bluesky themselves which reduces traffic.
A limited scope appview and relay is possible too, you can choose to only serve one community, and then fetch external content on-demand (but this will have the same impacts on latency as Mastodon and lemmy has when opening previously unseen threads)
Immigration courts have far less rights, even to citizens, it takes ages to appeal past it to a real court
This is client dependent. I use Thunder, the sharing option lets you choose between the community’s instance for the share link, or the instance hosting your account.
When opening links to other instances I believe you can use search on your own instance, paste the URL to open it on your local instance
Ranked choice also opens up for people voting for the “safe” choice while still expressing discontent by ranking another much less viable option representing their real preference. This also generates a strong signal of how strong support alternative candidates have, giving them a significant advantage in determining when it’s worth campaigning
And slightly fancier than approval voting for multiple winner elections.
Because they were outnumbered, they had to distract the crowd to not let them reach the politicians. There were a goddamn guillotine outside, and several participants are guilty of violent crimes and had weapons stashed in vehicles nearby.
If you want democracy you want to end winner-takes-all elections and go for proportional representation, and you want ranked choice voting or equivalent.
Attacking people for explaining the consequences of choices with the current terrible voting system doesn’t promote democracy
You’re a mod and didn’t ever see it?
I can dig up dozens of threads on bluesky (didn’t go into a lot of conversations about it here or elsewhere), but you can see in this very thread there’s other people who encountered them.
The attitude is also remarkably unprofessional with the mod flag visible
I’m not the only person here who remember that crowd.
What should I prove next, 1+1=2?
That’s what they’re supposed to do, doesn’t mean it’s what they do in practice.
Then prove I’m making it up, if it’s so easy
Revisionism
Ask for the guards’ takes on what happened instead
It’s technically right, but the problem is there’s just one DNC and no other viable party. If you had dozens of viable parties like other western countries, then it would no longer matter that one of them has opaque nomination processes, because there would still be competition on political positions.