The police must be independent if they are to become efficient. They must form a closed, autonomous organization in order to operate by the most direct and efficient means and not be shackled by subsidiary considerations. And in this autonomy, they must be self-confident in respect to the law. It matters little whether police action is legal, if it is efficient. The rules obeyed by a technical organization are no longer rules of justice or injustice. They are "laws” in a purely technical sense. As far as the police are concerned, the highest stage is reached when the legislature legalizes their independence of the legislature itself and recognizes the primacy of technical laws.

For what does order signify? In effect, the same thing as efficiency. Law must assure order. Order is the application of the will of the state. Law must be efficient. Efficiency is itself order. Once more we witness a general transformation of means into ends. Law thus becomes an activity without any end and without any meaning. It is efficient for efficiency s sake; and individual laws are conceived solely with a view to being efficient.

The Technological Society, Jacques Ellul.

Accusation in a mirror.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6207062/

That’s on top of the ~5% change of climate shifting towards hotter/drier since the classification system began.

Land Value Tax

The new model won’t have businesses and consumers. It will be the monarch and subject-slaves, the “state” will be the only company. It’s not feasible, profoundly stupid even, but that’s the direction we are heading.

The end goal of the Trump administration is to dismantle democracy, Balkanize America and establish a patchwork of technofeudal city-states. This move seems to perfectly align with that plan.

If you’re interested, this video might shed some light on it.

https://youtu.be/S96e6TdJlNE

Welcome to the spectacle of hyperreality.

Nice reference.

Although I’m not demanding absolute truth, I mean in the context of society truth is relative and convincing everyone of truth (not absolute, but the best objective truth we have) is virtually impossible, if you want to convince people it has to be simple and seductive, a caricature of the truth, a lie. Half the country subscribes to magical thinking, and most place more value in image over substance.

Even in the realm of science, there is no such thing as absolute truth, at least not in any capacity humans can ever understand. We have theories based on empirical evidence which we accept as “truth” because that is as good as we can get, some things have more truth than others, which closes the gap on things we have to take as self-evident and better align with understanding and reality.

Refer to Agrippa’s trilemma: it is theoretically impossible to prove any truth.

Ahh gotcha, well I recommend reading some Baudrillard, you’re angry over something that doesn’t exist anymore (if it ever did). Truth is all just relative now, shifting like sand in the desert.

Whether he is or isn’t is irrelevant, it’s the image of him portrayed by media that counts. The medium is the message. You should really look into Vladislav Surkov, the architect of Russia’s post-truth society, which the Trump admin imported to the states and is now common practice. The guy is clearly an idiot, maybe he means well but again that is irrelevant. This has Republican hit job written all over it from the get-go, I wouldn’t be surprised if Collins team found out about the tattoo (before he even decided to run) and directed “political technicians” to infiltrate his social circle and subtly nudge this guy to run, consequently becoming an unwitting accomplice to sabotage a genuine left-wing movement.

I may be reading too much into it, but consider “His former political director said he “knows damn well” what the tattoo signifies.”.

I understand you’ve invested a lot of emotional energy into this guy. It’s best to disconnect those feelings from things you can’t change, if he wins he wins, if not that’s ok, learn and grow from the experience.

When the media stated we live in a “post-truth” society, they meant it. Trump admin imported the Russian propaganda tactics of Surkov. This is our reality now, nothing is true or false, it’s all just information.

His former political director said he “knows damn well” what the tattoo signifies.

Only 13 of IG Farben received prison terms, from 1.5 to 8 years, then received senior positions on the successor companies after.

“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.”

—Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951).

This whole thing feels reminiscent of the Maoist Hundred Flowers campaign, in so far as we are in the lead up to a campaign of severe repression on all those who have been outspoken against the administration.

To settle ideological problems, one must act through the democratic methods of discussion, criticism, persuasion, and appropriate education.” But we must remember the—incidentally quite remarkable—method of the “Hundred Flowers.” As in Nazi Germany in 1943,° there was a period of apparent liberalism when expressions of all sort of criticism, deviationism, idealistic and religious inclinations, and so on, were tolerated, authorized, even encouraged. Then, after all opponents had spoken, the wave of repression hit them: arrests, jail sentences, and, above all, political re-education took place. The purpose of the “Hundred Flowers Campaign” was to make opponents come out in the open so they could be arrested and eliminated.

https://archive.org/details/jacques-ellul-propaganda

A single sentence can contain multiple fallacies. Also it’s 5 logical fallacies, 1 rhetorical technique and 1 that just describes your general attitude. I’m not wasting any more time on you.

Your argument relies on a litany of logical fallacies: straw man, false dilemma, sarcasm as substitute, slippery slope, red herring and on top of that you’re gish galloping and making a bad faith argument.

What fascinates me is this convergence of right and left-wing philopshies. Dugin’s Fourth Political Theory draws on Baudrillard’ Simulation and Simulacra and Debord’s Society of the Spectacle. You then have a connection between the neoreactionary Dark Enlightenment traced to Baudrillard through Yarvin’s “blue/red pill” coinage and the Matrix reference of Baudrillard at the beginning of the movie. Then Baudrillard’s Fatal Strategies of defeating the system by pushing it to its conclusion grotesquely mirrors the goals of these right acceleration movements within the Trump camp.

I’ll be honest, after reading Luke Kemp’s Goliath’s Curse, I think we have to accept the inevitability of civilization collapse. The right has not only accepted it as fact, but has planned and is executing their vision of the future. Of course it will be a travesty of whatever utopia they envision, but the left is woefully at a disadvantage with the most coherent strategy of “return to status quo”.

I’m just going to address your comment about Black people and sports.

Black people do not have a higher natural talent in sports, for Black youth sports is one of the only ways to achieve success, so they place a higher emphasis on sports. It’s evident because they are only dominant in the sports they have access to.

Pointing out that you harbor racist sentiments is not thought terminating, it’s apparent in your writing.