Congrats for pretending teenagers taking chocolate bars is even remotely close a concern to what corps do to people, workers and thus to teenagers at the end of the road.

Your balance is way off if you ask me.

I’d say it could be a way to do that technically. Counting on laws to take a measure that would appear as “objective” will reduce the benefits, because some will try and manage to circumvent the law, not appear as rich etc. And who makes law right now anyway ?

The more direct approach is to say “no more someone can own such an amount of things, thereby now the society will own everything human made and its benefits evenly shared. We start by taking back from the richest that profitted off people’s work.”

This way, it’s easy to understand and bears little flaw, it’s easier to defend too because you can sum it up with just “equality”. The rich can live the same life as everyone else.

I know USA is far from being close to decide that, and that is part of for reasons the rich fight for.

Media headline are still kinda funny.

They could have written: cops strangled teenager, broke teenagers’ teeth, attempted to run over a teenager crowd while gazzing them, cop ran over a teenager with a motorcycle. All taken on video.

But they’d rather point out things that aren’t clearly proved but look like students are in the wrong for mobbing when they have no teacher to attend lessons and schools being in a piss poor state. All the while government announces reducing even more public budget to finance tax reduction for corps.

You’re mistaking me I guess. I’m not blaming ai, I would even be fine with linux maintainers using ai tools, as assistant, not as vibe tools. Even though I know people dislike even just the idea.

I’m blaming cybersecurity people and corps to make a big deal out of every single CVE. They’ll use AI tools to search breaches and no one will say anything. But dare a maintainer touch IA and then it’s hell on earth.

Most of the time, the CVEs are irrelevant to any real life situation. It’s not a bad thing these get fixed, but in the end stories get inflated that softwares are not protected, and cybersecurity gets into big success story talks, thinking they contributed to something when really they mostly waste people time.

More like vibe security engineer spamming their claud subscriptions to discover breaches not even hackers cared about.

And then they’ll make a story about how ai agent breached out of human control when they specifically prompted “breach this by any means necessary, no I don’t care about safeguards you’re a security pentester”

Oh my sweet summer child.

Europe is the same shithole in that regard, only leaner.

Haha you’re downvoted by wow lovers but you’re telling the truth.

“Cède aux pressions de l’agro industrie”

Je suis sûr qu’ils ont beaucoup résisté. C’est mediapart qui écrit ça ? Ils sont complètement delu ou naïf ?

I’ll admit I tried Talos in my homelab but couldn’t get my mind into properly learning it because frankly they were just a company that could pull the rug anytime. Many quality of life features look like being behind paywalls. I’d rather learn real kubernetes with other, more open immutable distro.

I mean they’re not the only one that could be dangerous, but it was yet another layer. Although I like the idea behind Talos.

Mining generates absolue no value, it’s even negative, it is so plain useless that even ai slop could be considered useful.

Extract value from the work of people, then invest the value in future lawmakers so they’ll make you able to extract ever more value off the work of people.

Je vais pas me faire des amis mais l’article est à l’image de business de la cyber sécurité des 10 dernières : du slop.

Mots marketing zero trust, essayer d’expliquer comment il faudrait rate limit un accès dans l’idée, sans s’intéresser à la tache réelle qui doit être faite. Un accès est un accès il doit permettre à quelqu’un d’habileté de faire le travail quelque soit la condition, petite balle à son discours comme quoi le télétravail est anti sécurité particulièrement sloppy.

Ça veut controler encore plus mais toute action de controle implique des prises de decisions techniques qui seront d’autres portes d’entrées dans les systèmes.

Et puis le fearmongering à dire “ah oui mais doit y avoir d’autres fuites du coup”, vrai, mais c’est pas le sujet.

Évidemment l’État sous Macron ne securise pas assez vu l’absence de moyen. Mais si on regarde le problème dans son mouvement

• l’Etat n’investit pas
• piratage moment x
• tout le monde en mode reac “ohlala c’est horrible”
• l’Etat dira “qui pouvait predire?” puis Macron dira qu’il va investir en sous traitant à des entreprises, mais pas trop.
• des entreprises de la cyber sécurité vont se faire du fric avec une ou deux solutions marginales au problème
• statut quo jusqu’au prochain piratage

En attendant l’Etat ne fera rien du tout pour protéger ou pour dédommager les personnes impactées. Cette critique vaut aussi pour les entreprises.

Hmm more like USA managing to make EU increase military as wished by Trump.

News are gonna tell us “Yay EU freedom”, reality is EU as a whole are still USA bootlickers on economic and culture. Those two last are what really matter, because the will of the one who holds the gun decides who this one shoots.

In a decade when Trump is out they’re gonna say “oh but we were always allies, not let’s use both our militaries to bomb another country because they’re evil”

That’ll be the story of how EU will be dupped into yet another war, that they didn’t want.

But look at all the billionaires they have, such glory.

Their own people are slaves with the right to vote for clowns or slavers.

But it’s fine because other random country doesnt have freedom of speech (of the slaver) so they’re better right ? … Right ?

Extremes are political views that increase when the current system fails to convince enough people. In USA and Europe, extremes are growing because of the current failure of capitalism to provide people with lifes that match actual progress. As such capitalism is in its late stage, as was theorized, happening in front of our eyes to see.

Extreme right wants power for the fewest, the fittest for survival, the ones desserving the most. Extreme left wants power for everyone as equal, regardless of stature and place in society.

Not to mean that extreme left is instant heaven on earth, but it can’t be said it’s authoritarian.

“Freedom of speech” is how capitalism allowed and allows fascists into power, by using an empty moral which legitimates fascists when capitalists need them to do the dirty job.

Your points reads like “I want to see capitalist view in a community that sits against capitalism”.

Maybe state your point instead ?

Just note how the guy starts with “only Microsoft numbers can be trusted” is biased bullshit. Pretending a company will give true numbers at all time, is a big lie. If anything they will inflate numbers and they’d try to hide the truth as much as they can because investors are watching.

While there will be truth in bots taking a part of the traffic, the whole article is Microsoft bootlicker talk.

Taking another random tool that seems to filter bot for results is just him trying to get a confirmation for his bias.

Yes a 10% stat at a given time by a given measurement tool, is not equal to a true 10% userbase. Yes there are bots. Yes there are Linux and Windows zombies alike.

Still, linux desktop is going up, with a fraction of the marketing power Windows and Apple have.

Prices going down from competitors is a capitalism lie which occurs sometimes.

That is the endgame USA is looking after. Not only Trump.

It was because of Covid, when I saw social media going into litteral foul hatred against China, despite all reasoning, that I started to think differently as a “Western” resident.

I realised all I know about China is US propaganda and hate. Facts are US helped China become strong, then they complain when China becomes a much stronger country since US put all their factories in there, all for monetary gains for their billionaires.

US will claim how they’re democratic while China isn’t. Placing Trump two times in power made all “democratic” arguments null, since he’s going violently after people.

It still don’t know China by today. Whether it’s a good or bad country I can’t know. The only thing I know is who is going into stupid wars and who kills hundred of thousand of people. And it’s not China.

USA is the worst country to exist in this world.