The term sodomy on its own usually means anal sex, but in this particular case, the verb form “sodomize” is indeed referring to

Before the election, I was able to see this multiple poll breakdown that was kind of surprising. If you were under 35 and male, you were more likely to have voted CPC. Every other group (esp. women under 35 and everyone over 65) was more likely to vote LPC. This tells me Poilievre’s social media campaign, which you may recall was highly “manosphere”-coded was effective with the target group. The good news then is that (while not making the same mistake as the CPC and forgetting other demographics exist), we can reach these people with a smart approach online.

I think Rational National has a good point in that video I linked that maybe these folks who were taken in by the Conservatives were under the impression because the Liberals were in charge as long as they can remember, everything is solely their fault. They’re likely missing the overall historical context that we can’t afford to keep the tax burden on poor people (especially as wages stagnate) instead of the rich (whose incomes have been exploding up until Trump’s market crashes) as we’ve been doing increasingly for decades upon decades.

They don’t want Gemini, so they stated probably the best way to avoid having Gemini. It’s a privacy-minded comment. Despite being Google’s own phone, Pixels may be the only phones you can unlock to flash with a different ROM (GrapheneOS) and then be able to lock again after for security.

True. We’ve only kicked the can down the road at best with this election, so this has been on my mind as more important than ever right now. But even if we get a good form of proportional representation, we can’t get complacent. We still have to win a war of ideas.

Prominent supporters of the CPC here in Canada want to implement a (faster!) DOGE-like process. It’s also very concerning that Labour in the UK (rough equivalent to our LPC) is slashing survival-necessary benefits for disabled young people, and their ascending Reform Company-that-runs-as-a-party is championing a Trump-style agenda. Australia’s Liberal party (rough equivalent to CPC) wanted to do the same, but luckily there’s been a backlash.

For now, Australia looks likely to follow what we did and re-elect their Labour party (LPC equivalent) as government. Soon, people in the US won’t be able to avoid the reality of a massive wave of layoffs starting at docks and the transportation sector and fanning its way out across supply chains (unless they can somehow miraculously head this off or their manufacturing sector proves more resilient). Maybe global opinion will change then, but there’s always the risk we’ll get even more of the same push we’ve had for decades upon decades from every major party: “Slashing taxes for the rich and cutting services didn’t work? Guess we have to do it even harder!”

Wth is wrong with a fade (low or otherwise)? I’m afraid to know what kind of meme is so horrible when it just sounds like a basic haircut.

That’s not what their base believes. There is a whole other fantasy reality in their channels about how Carney has planned all along to cut a secret deal with Trump after the election. Other justification narratives probably exist as well, because they have to keep people believing that obviously, everyone knows we couldn’t possibly do anything other than completely fold into Trump’s plans. They spew propagandistic garbage like this and teach people to distrust legit media that understands context and checks facts rather than running with conspiracy theories based on flimsy evidence.

I’m Canadian, so no I’ve never voted for any US candidate. I didn’t advocate any particular kind of political action (or non-action) in my comment except not to drive people away if you want to have them on your side.

What simpler point can there possibly be than “Alienating people doesn’t earn you their support; it’s better to build trust and win them over”? The basic reality is that people don’t all think the same way, so they have to be met where they’re at.

Laughed out loud when I got to “Whil Wheaton.” 😄

This must be why Kayla Detmer looked weirdly familiar in Discovery. Did the Blink Drive also have a genetically special human pilot? I can’t remember.

He’d probably not get it, and think the person was coming on to him instead of the intended effect.

Tooth floss and kids toothbrushes (or adult brushes with smaller heads).

Attitude has a range including your standard gel pastes with fluoride.

Punching down by portraying people you theoretically want on your side as villains is not a winning strategy for anyone left of centre. Dividing people only helps the right, no matter who is doing it. I don’t even think ordinary folks who’ve been conned into believing (Maple) MAGA-esque propaganda should automatically be bashed in every case-- just persons in positions of significant power. The priority should always be to seek opportunities to genuinely win folks over.

Also, while it’s true there may have been too much immigration in a short time, that’s not a primary reason for housing costs rising. Asset prices are going up because homes are treated as an investment. At least according to graphs in this Breach video, there’s been no correlation between immigration and housing costs.

Economist Gary Stevenson has outlined many times as well how homes increasing in value for an extended period of time can actually be seen as a precursor to a shrinking middle class, though middle class people often don’t see increasing pricing as a feature of wealthier buyers out-competing them.

Doesn’t using a car wash without putting the car in “car wash mode” first void its warranty, or was that false news? (I don’t remember where I heard it.) Nice way to make a lot of unsuspecting people void their warranty.

Neat. My junior high friend group used to come up with some ridiculous stuff this way! That said, even though playing around with absurdities was very fun, I wonder if those of us here on Lemmy could come up with something dramatic and even moving?

I had it here in Canada, decades ago. My memories are vague but I remember thinking it wasn’t bad at all. (Probably no lung, but there was definitely stomach.)

“Unalived” might be a euphemism that’s only necessary on certain social media to avoid censorship nowadays, but people were using the term “disappearing” (especially as a transitive verb) during Chile’s Pinochet regime, if not earlier.

I probably wouldn’t have tried durian or nattou if I didn’t know what they were, but maybe I’ll notice some exception some day. (I might have still tried haggis since I don’t recall it having any smell to it, but I wouldn’t feel better not knowing what it was.)

I don’t know if it has that effect normally or you mean it would be laced, but they probably wouldn’t eat a strong-smelling food in the first place. (Speaking for myself though, I sure would try as long as I know what it is.)

I thought it might be a cute way to say they’d be a waste of time and money.