Why the classification of “borders on state terrorism” rather than actually being classified as such?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guernica_(Picasso)

Da kann man über die Mauer unterm Schaufenster mit froh sein.

Neben Bestechlichkeit und Geldwäsche werden ihm nun auch Betrug und mehrfache Steuerhinterziehung vorgeworfen.

Das hört sich ja schon nach “Wie viel dieser Möglichkeiten kann ich abdecken?” an. Die “be your worst” challenge.

I blocked bing.com on my PC (invalid hostname resolution through hosts entry) because despite best efforts to disable any websearch functionality in Windows search, it still showed up.

I opened a PDF today, that was linked on a website. But the PDF opened in Google Docs (displayed there as x.pdf). The first page loaded fast, but I waited like 10 or 15 seconds for the rest of it - confused whether it’s just one page or image or what, and then confused how I change pages if not scrolling, but turned out it just took ages to load.

Just link the damned PDF doc.

On Mastodon it looks like this:

My reply (second screenshot) did not show up here on Lemmy. I assume because lemmy.world blocks replies from mastodon.social.

No, I replied from feddit.org.

On lemmy you can see where the account is from

and you should be able to see Kissaki@feddit.org.

I tried to reply to my long comment from mastodon.social, but it didn’t show up. I assume lemmy.world blocks replies from mastodon.social.

Given the diverse nature, instances can control to what degree they connect to other instances within the Fediverse.

One instance may block another because of spam or extremist or illegal accounts or content. Or they may allow interaction but only for those explicitly seeking it out instead of showing it within their own interface. etc

I’m not an expert, but…

even when doing so wouldn’t necessarily undermine their broader position

Conceding one wrong is proof that you, your view or argumentation, is flawed. Conceding just one minor point puts every point’s validity into question.

Even if you can conclude that it’s irrelevant both factually there’s social and emotional aspects to it.

We are driven not only by reason, but in large part by emotion, and our ingrained social psyche.

Even if it is factually irrelevant, conceding is confirming fault, and may cause anxiety about repercussions in terms of social standing (how you are seen by the others) and for your argument as a whole (will you be trusted when something you said was wrong).

What you describe as building identity is building that identity around a set of beliefs and group of people.

Depending on the group and beliefs, two aspects come into play:

Group dynamics of in-group and out-group. Loyalty may be more important than reason. The own group is likely seen as better than the “others”. Others may be seen as inferior or as enemies.

If you acknowledge just one point integral to the groups beliefs, what does that mean for you as a part of that group? Will you lose all your social standing? Will you lose being part of the group?

Somewhat unrelated and related at the same time, because self-identity is also a construct to build stable group associations; building your confidence and self-identity around a set of values, conceding on some of them means losing stability and confidence in yourself, your worth.

The human psyche is still largely driven by genetics developed in ancient times, and the environment.

As a social create, it was critically important to be able to join groups and stay in them, to have strong and stable bonds. This persists today, in our psyche and behaviors.

The fediverse is a diverse social network that is distributed across multiple platforms.

Going from the basis to the specific services:

• The ActivityPub protocol defines a protocol - data structures and forms of data transfers
• The Fediverse is a collection of different social networks and services hosting these social networks that can and do connect and communicate with each other
• Various social platform software like Lemmy, Pixelfed, Mastodon implement (“speak”) ActivityPub and are part of the Fediverse
• Anyone willing can run (host) their own instance of these, by downloading and running them
• The platforms have difference interfaces and capabilities, but in one form or another, users can connect and use other platforms despite them being “different”

For example:

Lemmy is a social platform like Reddit, but anyone can host their own instance. Users can make accounts and create communities on different instances. Users can then follow and interact with communities from other instances.

For example, my account is on feddit.org, but I am posting this comment to !asklemmy@lemmy.world. Because I follow the community, feddit.org fetches and copies the data from that community, and any activity from either side gets communicated to the other. As a result, you on lemmy.world and me on feddit.org can both see and interact with the same community.

Mastodon is a social platform like Twitter. Someone may have their account on mastodon.social, which is one such instance running Mastodon. Despite being a different use-case and interface, they can follow, read, and post to Lemmy communities.

I tried replying to this comment from mastodon.social. I was able to view this post and this comment. I don’t know if the comment will show up or not; maybe lemmy.world blocks mastodon.social comments.

The Fediverse is the collection of compatible services and networks that can speak and connect to each other.

While breaking the agreement? If they’re breaking the agreement, what difference does it make where it comes from?

Mislabeling would be a problem no matter what they trade. And ultimately sabotage any trade deals.

Onomatopoesie, oder “Lautmalerei”, ist die sprachliche Nachahmung von außersprachlichen Schallereignissen.

Sehr interessant finde ich dabei die Japanische Lautmalerei, in der es viele solche Sprachkonstrukte gibt. Und dies, anders als im Deutschen, auch im Sprachgebrauch direkt verwendet wird, als beschreibende Adjektive, statt in der Regel nur Laute zu beschreiben.

Gitaigo hingegen beschreibt keine hörbaren Phänomene, sondern den Zustand bzw. die Beschaffenheit von Gegenständen, die Art und Weise von Handlungen oder Gefühlen sowie sinnliche Empfindungen.

Gitaigo gehören, strikt gesehen, zu den Ideophonen, weil sie etwas nicht Hörbares beschreiben. Es ist jedoch nicht immer leicht, eine klare Linie zwischen Giongo und Gitaigo zu ziehen. Das genannte „shiin“ beispielsweise beschreibt den „Ton“ von etwas nicht Hörbarem. Auch „dokidoki“ kann durchaus das Gefühl beim starken Herzklopfen sein, weil man das eigene Herz normalerweise nicht hören kann, auch wenn man aufgeregt ist.

In der deutschen Umgangssprache gibt es ebenfalls Wörter, die Ideophonen ähneln, wie z. B. Zickzack, holterdipolter, ratzfatz, pille-palle oder plemplem.

Having trade deals on both sides doesn’t man you can ship whatever from one to the other.

They can trade over set of things with one, and another set with the other.

If my gov creates a digital cert of age and signs it then I should be able to use that and the service provider can verify against gov public key, no? No information of visit exchanged.

As an alternative I also expect it to be possible via zero knowledge proof https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-knowledge_proof

Die hat nämlich FAZt genausoviel.

!rentnerfahrenindinge@feddit.org

Sagt nichts über breite Unfallstatistik aus, aber die Community ist immer gut gefüllt.

Isn’t that a matter of implementation whether they even receive this information or not during validation?

Lol that drop icon

Reads “A drop” or “B dropped”

And is so expressive I can hear the crack - even though it’s a shock resistance rather than crack-ability.

What do you mean by violating privacy?

If you have a passport, citizenship, or birth certificate your age is already documented.

If it takes only two minutes, do it right away.