I’m beautiful and tough like a diamond…or beef jerky in a ball gown.

  • 240 Posts
  • 1.05K Comments
Joined 7 个月前
cake
Cake day: 2025年7月15日

help-circle
  • which does not explain why this port or the others are blocked. I also lack the technical background to understand this decision.

    Don’t take this the wrong way, but understanding the reason for that decision is pretty important if you’re planning to run your own email server. A misconfigured email server (which is very easy to do) becomes a problem for everyone else when it inevitably gets used to spam. There’s also a lot of ancillary things to configure correctly as well (DKIM, SPF, DMARC policies, spam filtering, etc) lest everything seems to work but no one is able to receive mail from you or it always ends up in their spam folder.

    While I disagree with port 25 being permanently blocked on residential (and often even business-class) connections, I understand why in the grand scheme of things.

    I don’t read Finnish, but here are the general reasons why:

    1. Port 25 is for SMTP transport and typically only used for server-to-server (MTA) email traffic. This is unauthenticated between servers. Clients (MUAs) connect through a “submission” port which is pretty much expected to be authenticated/access-controlled. That’s why you can send emails to an email provider but you can’t be an email provider yourself. By blocking port 25, malicious people or people that have been compromised with malware cannot just blindly blast out spam email. This reduces spam considerably, though with a compromise of slightly restricting what a residential connection can be used for.

    2. Most big email providers universally block emails that originate from an IP address that’s assigned to a residential IP/provider. Same reason as above. This means even if your ISP were to unblock port 25 for you, you likely wouldn’t be able to send email to any major email provider (Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo, AOL, etc) as they would just sinkhole any messages you send to users there.

    That’s pretty much it in a nutshell.

    Can you bypass that and host at home?

    Yes, if you’re willing to work for it. You can setup a VPS (cloud server) and port-forward across a VPN connection to your home server. Your DNS records for your email server would point to the VPS’s IP, and the email server would need to be configured to use the VPS as its default route so all traffic goes in/out over the VPN connection. This is how my email server is configured.

    Sounds easy enough, right? Well, good luck getting a VPS with a “clean” IP. Most VPSs you can get in public clouds are already on one or more public spam blocklists as well as many private/internal blocklists. You can clean up an IPs reputation and make it work with minimal to no delivery problems, but it’s a LOT of work and often requires finding hidden forms to submit the request (Microsoft/Outlook was a brute, and I only found the link to the form in a forum post). I’ve cleaned up two IPs like that, and it took 2-3 weeks of work before I was able to get reliable delivery.




  • They’re separate queens and separate collectives/cooperatives.

    The Jurati Cooperative is, as of the end of Season 2, guarding the spatial anomaly that formed in the beginning of S2. They’re completely absent from the third season. Which I can understand since S3 was a fan-service reunion (which I loved) and there just wasn’t room in the 10 episodes for them.

    The queen from S3 is the same one from VOY: Endgame and First Contact and part of the same collective since they were first introduced in TNG.

    The new one affected the other one?

    AFIAK, no, they had no effect on each other. The alternate timeline queen (that turned into Queen Jurati) was not the same queen seen in S3 or elsewhere. That queen was from a 2401 that no longer exists. She and her cooperative only exist because they went back in time and took the long way back to 2401.








  • It’s so common for “anti-censorship” to be code for “Nazi-friendly” that I’m immediately suspicious of any platform that uses that as a selling point.

    I’m similarly suspicious, but it’s not just code for “nazi-friendly” but also crackpots, maladaptives, etc. Rational people who read and say “anti-censorship” in this context know it means that it’s not beholden to corporate or government interests. But everyone else seems to want to interpret that as “I can say whatever I want! How dare you mod anything I say?! Freeze-peach, y’all!”

    I wish they’d pick a different term for these non-corporate alternatives, but I don’t have a better suggestion to offer right now.





  • In order and in character:

    1. [Chidi]: No, that would be highly unethical
    2. [Eleanor] Of course. How else would you do it?
    3. [Eleanor] Obviously they had it coming so no harm no foul.
    4. [Jason] Nah, Pill-Boi said it was fine.
    5. [Tahani] My heavens, no. I would never want to upset my friend Ray. Charles. Ray Charles was my friend.
    6. [Jason] In Jacksonville we’re legally required to.
    7. [Chidi] Given the ethical implications of restraining user freedom but also providing safety for the majority of people, we have to take into account several factors [ pulls out a blackboard, stomach ache intensifies ]…




  • I don’t even bother with local ports anymore. It’s just too much hassle when I switch providers, email services all seem to universally sinkhole anything originating from a residential IP even if I am able to convince them to unblock 25/TCP, and I refuse to pay extra for a static IP or upsell to business class at a massive price increase.

    My ISP, while otherwise fine, still has not rolled out IPv6 yet and the DHCPv4 lease duration is short and will randomly assign a different IP rather than renewing the lease on the existing one. I don’t like relying on dynamic DNS or relying on running a daemon to update my public DNS records when my public IP changes. Been there, done that, and bought a crappy t-shirt at the gift shop.

    I’ve had a VPS for close to 10 years now that is my main frontend and, through some VPN and routing trickery, allows me to have my email server on-prem but use the VPS for all inbound and outbound communication. A side effect benefit of this setup is I can run my email server from literally anywhere and from anything with an internet connection. I’ve got a copy of my email stack on a Pi Zero clone that stays in sync with my main one. During long power outages, I can start that up and run it from a hotspot with a power bank running it for almost 2 days (or indefinitely when I’m also charging the power bank from a solar panel lol).



  • I can understand that speeds vary by area, but it’s not like it’s difficult at all to have those in a database where a web tool can return them based on your zip code. But yeah, it was like that when I signed up with Optimum (nee Suddenlink) years ago.

    The other thing they do is require a truck roll for any kind of hookup. They almost got some of my business back but were so rigid that I said “the hell with it”. My fiber provider was having some growing pains and I called Optimum to reactivate my service on a lower plan to use as a backup connection (I work from home). All they needed to do was setup the account and re-authorize my modem (my hookup was still live and I had my own modem). They flat out refused to do any of that and required a tech to come “within 3-5 business days” and read the modem serial number to them to activate it. So I said hell with it, called T-Mobile, and activated my old 5G hotspot.


  • I would guess it’s not just Comcast. Optimum serves my area and they’ve basically been begging people to switch back since this area got fiber a few years ago.

    Their offers are like $25/mo for 200/10 Mbps and no data caps. But they’re not guaranteeing the price. Seems like they’re going after the lower end of the market.

    I basically say “boo hoo”. This is what actual competition looks like. Cable companies have sat on their ass and milked their infrastructure for decades (only updating the headend equipment to keep up).

    Optimum cold called me once and I flat out told them if they wanted me back, they need to run fiber to my home, give me the same symmetrical speed I have now, for at least $10 less than I’m paying my fiber provider, and lock that price for at least 5 years. The rep basically kinda sighed, so I guess they’ve heard that response from more than just me.