Run amok or not, I don’t understand how it got so sideways on that narrow bridge.

I’ll remember that in case I drop it into a boiler.

For those outside the UK, “fly-tipping” means the much more clearly phrased “illegal dumping”.

It is not similar to cow-tipping at all.

Edit: this concept of destroying cars as punishment should really catch on more.

Well, see, Syria has land they want and people they don’t.

I think it’s funny darkly humorous but read the room, dude.

If their stated goal was the truth and they wanted to follow the law, yes.

As it is, it’s blatant and intentional voter suppression.

I’m trying to imagine how that is possible, Pinterest always showed up in google search results with something that looked promising but didn’t actually exist on their site. I can only imagine that it’s even worse now post-AI.

That was how I read it at first too, but she at least implies that she is his “quirky girlfriend” depending on how you interpret it.

She says “hugged by his quirky girlfriend” which suggests they might be, or at least that’s how she sees the relationship. Could be clearer.

deleted by creator

There’s a little bit way down in the article.

The mother and son had their routine call on April 3. Lucy Garzón remembers her son complaining of stomach pains and the poor quality of the jail’s food. He asked her to send money to his commissary account. Garzón-Rayo also said he’d received medical care for stomach issues.

“[Brayan] told me: ‘Mother, it was weird. The doctor told the officer something, and he made a strange face, but they didn’t tell me anything,'” she recalled. Garzón-Rayo asked her, “Can we find out if there was a problem?”

Then they eventually called to say he had attempted suicide by hanging himself, and was in the hospital likely to die.

From those descriptions: At the bare minimum it was 100% negligence, possibly the slightly worse covering up negligence, or much worse covering up maltreatment. And I would lean towards the latter if I had to guess.

I apologize for misunderstanding/misquoting. However, I’m not sure why you were even disagreeing with the original comment.

What lawlessness do you feel someone was saying should go unpunished? The only thing they said was that people should not be deported, and I would even read that to mean “without due process” or perhaps “as punishment”.

Did you mean something else by “this type of lawlessness”? I went back and reread several times and I cannot see another interpretation.

“Immigrating illegally -> deport without due process” is the extremist angle. That’s lawlessness that no one should in good conscience support.

I don’t see anyone saying that breaking the law should go unpunished, just that deportation is not an appropriate penalty especially when there are existing more appropriate penalties. That does not seem extreme to me.

I think the problem is the phrasing which seems to absolve the jail of responsibility.

We know it’s a bad situation when the basic elements of the constitution are considered “extreme and radical”

No person shall … be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.

Repercussions aside where does he get the idea that trump’s government is in any way smaller?

Because it’s the lingua franca of the world.

Which dystopian cyberpunk medium depicted this level of hell? This is echoes of Nazi Germany here.

Yeah but this is the US.

You think we’ll be using trains?