

I agree that aboriginal treatment of women was often horrific, but when it comes to sorcery, you have to understand that the white people’s idea of reality simply wasn’t present in precolonial Australia. Singing was and continues to be a serious issue with serious consequences, and if someone has good reason to believe sorcery was used in the carrying out of a murder, they should be able to present that evidence to the local authorities (the tribe elders) and seek payback.
Payback is a much more humane approach to criminal punishment than the white people’s prison system. White people lock a lad up for years and destroy his relationship to his community, so as often as not he’s forced to commit crimes again to survive. Payback is quick and simple, and once it’s done, the victim is expected to forgive the criminal. No bloody cycles of revenge, no more hard feelings. It’s exactly the opposite of the “tribalism” we see in white society, with ancient blood feuds between different groups. This is just another example of white people assuming their social flaws are human nature, and that they are somehow the best at rising above it. Projection, in other words.
As you read in the excerpt I shared, aboriginal tribes would go to war, and the leaders would instruct the warriors to avoid shedding blood. And if no blood was spilled, it would be considered a great victory. Look at the Crusades and tell Me what we’ve discussed today fits your idea of “tribalism” better than white people’s greatest “accomplishments”. The truth is, the realists are more militant in their quest to destroy opposing social groups than any tribe.
(Also pronouns)





















Hahaha more kelvin is cooler