Specialized AI like that is not what most people know as AI. Most people reffer to it as LLMs.

Specialized AI, like that showcased, is still decades away from generalized creative thinking. You can’t ask it to do a science experiment with in a class because it just can’t. It’s only built for math proof.

Again, my argument is that it won’t never exist.

Just that it’s so far off it’d be like trying to regulate smart phone laws in the 90s. We would have only had pipe dreams as to what the tech could be, never mind its broader social context.

So tall to me when it can, in the case of this thread, clinically validated ways of teaching. We’re still decades from that.

If you read, it’s capable of very little under the surface of what it is.

Show me one that is well studied, like clinical trial levels, then we’ll talk.

We’re decades away at this point.

My overall point of it’s just as meaningless to talk about now as it was in the 90s. Because we can’t convince of what a functioning product will be, never mind it’s context I’m a greater society. When we have it, we can discuss it then as we have something tangible to discuss. But where we’ll be in decades is hard to regulate now.

but what good is that if AI can do it anyway?

It can’t. It just fucking can’t. We’re all pretending it does, but it fundamentally can’t.

https://appleinsider.com/articles/24/10/12/apples-study-proves-that-llm-based-ai-models-are-flawed-because-they-cannot-reason

Creative thinking is still a long way beyond reasoning as well. We’re not close yet.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Because it test what you actually retained, not what you can convince an AI to tell you.

I don’t know how you can with a straight face say the states aren’t fascist the days after scanning of social media scanning

https://www.techpolicy.press/trumps-social-media-surveillance-social-scoring-by-another-name/

And the courts allow deportation of legal immigrants.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-allows-trump-revoke-protected-status-thousands-venezuela-rcna205657

I honestly wish to live in your reality. Sadly it’s not actual reality.

I really think you need to google the tolerance paradox.

The ONE thing a society must be intolerant of, is intolerance.

The KKK should be baned because they call for violence. They actively linch people. What are you talking about free speech?

Also, most places don’t have free speech, while the biggest “free speech” country is already facist, so I’m not sure your argument of free speech not leading to terrible things hold up.

Canada has hate speech laws and get along just fine?

Fun fact, abortion is only legal because of a supreme Court ruling in Canada.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_Canada

AFAIK fair use means you can redistribute.

I’m wrong about why,

But it’s been ruled as fair use

Decompiling doesn’t give you the code like you’d expect.

It gives you the instructions the code generates.

There’s a Lego island decomp documentary on YouTube that is recomend for more details.

But the actual source code used doesn’t get piped out. Instead you get the machine instructions and you make code that generates the same instructions.

Meaning your still writing the game yourself, meaning you own the copyright

It’s more than fascists, but I do hold plenty of love for those willing to show love in my life.

“People” just don’t however.

When the world decides to stop hating me for my existence…

It’s not focusing on one thing at a time, it’s people having a limited number of fucks to give right now.

I’m a trans lesbian, and I really don’t care when pride is celebrated. Because it’s not really about pride anymore at all. It’s all about corporate rainbow washing. So why would I care what month that happens in? I’d much rather deal with that problem than the month it’s celebrated in.

That’s not what Proffitt is.

My understanding is clauses that own work made outside of work (hours, resources, nonncompeteing scope, ect…) is not enforceable.

But if you do anything related to the company, then it’s theirs.

Canadian software developer here,

It’s really not. Contracts like that in Canada and US haven’t been used widely in a long time.

So the first line of what you quite says you can’t.

I’m a professional developer. If I learn and use it in my job, I’m in violation of the licese.

What I mean by value is the ability to learn and use it as you wish. Without worry of if your going against a license.

What’s the point of source available if I’m never allowed to derive value from it?