Ich bin etwas zwiegespalten. Mehrweg ist immer besser, keine Frage. Ich will allerdings wenn möglich auch gar kein Plastik in der Nähe meiner Nahrungsmittel, gerade wenn sie warm sind. Dann lieber vor Ort essen, oder direkt selbst backen.

Das macht mich glücklich, auch wenn er im Zweifel durch einen noch schlimmeren Menschen ersetzt wird sollte es zu Neuwahlen kommen. Aber jetzt noch komplett zu scheitern wäre einfach der perfekte Abschluss seiner Karriere.

God of War 2018 isn’t the same as God of War 2005, I’m not that old.

How did you support yourself after getting out?

Do you know why one would ever do that? 20(02/05)25 feels like the “Don’t Dead Open Inside” of dates.

Afaik, they are. It’s just that third party developers would need to optimize their file sizes heavily for the great pay off of reducing their profit margin. They already didn’t want to do that for the Switch and Nintendo now enables them to not do it to incentivize more ports.

At least in Japan, I think, every 1st party game comes on the cartridge, pretty much every third party game except for Cyberpunk comes as a code.

These games are meant to be played in 1st person and 3rd person is just an after thought. In this case, yes, that’s maybe just laziness or more likely they didn’t have time for low priority stuff.

There is nothing hard about 3D rotation, at least not for people successfully building a 3D open world game of that scope. Their characters can turn and you have a direction, there is no difference to walking in that sense.

If anything, assuming this is about NPCs, they didn’t want to create animations for that and just turning them mid animation looked stupid.

As for the PC, automatically turning the player is honestly a bad idea in first person. It can be disorienting for some players.

I’ve put about 60h into Metaphor Re:Fantazio last month. It’s a great follow-up to Persona 5, but there are some bad thing here as well. Within my 60h, while doing literally everything I could along the way, I’m currently in the dungeon to get the spear. I’m on hard mode.

It’s incredible how seemingly effortlessly Cranston pulls off Hal again. One friendly smile and the whole mental image I got from Breaking Bad is forgotten.

It’s interesting to see how your rating actually went down from the last summary I’ve seen (the one in German). However, this time around your mother’s reaction actually does sound worse.

Honestly, you’ve described her as someone I’d not want to even keep in contact with. But that’s of course entirely up to you. Best of luck on your journey in any case!

Now that I think about it, I wonder how large the ratio between ‘(’ and ‘)’ across the entire internet is, due to emoticons.

Most people write them left to right. Now, do people use the smiling one ‘:)’ more or the sad one ‘:(’? My gut feeling would be a larger quantity of positive emotions, however, people tend to use ‘:D’ instead.

How about individual chats? This could actually be an indicator about the relationship between people, at least in an era before emojis.

I’m not counting that, but did he take his ‘:)’ into consideration?

I’m a layman, too, so take everything with a grain of salt.

As for evidence, if I both understood and remember correctly, the maximum distance we can actually see something (Hubble radius) just happens to align quite nicely with the Schwarzschild radius, a parameter based on the mass of a black hole, which correlates to its radius. They have to be identical for this theory to be true. Them almost being so could be a coincidence, though.

In addition, from our perspective, there’s no real difference between an expanding universe and one with shrinking particles. If the planck length actually shrinks, to us, it will seem like everything else will move away. Within the last 100 years, multiple people created some models for that, proving how it could work while leaving physics as we observe them intact.

A proof could be found by observing a white hole, the opposite of a black hole. A space you cannot possibly enter, ejecting energy. Think of it as the stuff entering the black hole from the outside, as oberserved from the inside. They are just a theory for now.

Once again, I’ve got not actual clue and you might want to dive into that rabbit hole yourself. It’s fun in here.

For the most part, the story is nothing to write home about and it’s not exactly the most beautiful game out there. However, I think the mechanics are great - I did enjoy my time with BD2 a lot and would recommend it.

That being said, if you don’t enjoy the gameplay, it won’t change that much. You just get more classes.

I’ve not yet touched it. But since you mentioned it: How does leveling now work? And more importantly, how does enemy scaling work?

If I remember correctly, in the original, I felt strongest when I got Umbra at Lv 1 and just never levelled up.

Furthermore, how are the character animations? I saw the Emperor in the Remake and while the model was quite nice, in combination with his facial animations, I actually preferred the original. What I assume to be the original animations paird with updated models seemed too uncanny. However, that problem could be specific to him.

Pathetic = O[pa]s [Tiertisch]e, nehme ich an

That’s a fair point. My family isn’t exactly known for getting old. I didn’t even meet half my grandparents and the only one I really got to know only lived into my early teenage years. I’ll probably only get to around 70 myself.

Damn, I’m about a decade older than you and there’s no way I’d call 1950 recent in any way. For all I care, it’s just as much ancient history as the roman empire. I don’t know anyone alive from either period, at least not on a personal level.

2100 on the other hand feels closer because I’m expect to come close to it within my lifetime. At least closer than I ever was to 1950.

This actually does look quite nice. I never got around to Monark, their previous game. Did anyone play it? I remember Monark getting mixed reviews, but I forget why.