True, but its also nice to read about these nice small things.
True, but its also nice to read about these nice small things.
I’m not sure how that’s true since we wouldn’t be here in the first place without capitalism. Its the only known system efficient enough to get this far, that we know of anyway.
Nevertheless, going back to my original point… Moving on to better technology only works once its feasible enough, no matter what the economic system is. Ideology doesn’t negate the reality of resources.
Also not so weak if you find yourself at a height in the air.
And my point is that if you dismiss AI as a whole because of these criticisms, you’re failing to see that AI can be used other ways. But I’m not talking about you, I was responding to someone else.
It also doesn’t take much of a big brain to realize you can do more with AI than to use it as a writer or as an ideation tool for writing, which is a bad way to use it. Which goes back to my point that you need better critical thinking to criticize AI, because this ain’t it.
Okay, they did not say you have to enjoy them, but…
like ppl should write essays because they wanna say something.
That’s not why most people write essays. Like, cmon.
And yes, it’s important. That doesn’t mean we have to pretend we want to write essays for some reason.
True, true.
Nah, it’ll soak the compost bin, especially in the biodegradable bag.
not “have to pay”, “have to pay to use”
i’m sure there are much better tools available, but i’m just used to git gui where rescan, commit and push all are in order.
the original Switch already had online subscription…
How are you going to use the C button without paying?
I think it can get much worse.
Hopefully AI means more investment into renewables, as well.
That’s… that’s how change… works?
1 Oh sorry, did it in wrong order