During covid some father had to send photos of his baby to a doctor and google detected it as csam. They nuked all his accounts (including his phone number) reported it to police, who opened a case against him.

What’s really alarming is that all these tech firms hire people to look through this stuff manually, and pedos have been known to take this job. Essentially they pay pedos to look at csam all day. And the only way for ai to be accurate at all is for the ai to have been trained on csam. So if any AI company says they can detect csam their admitting that they’ve downloaded tons of it.

We were talking past each other I believe you about 4chan ect.

Doesn’t help that the question is vague

Removed by mod

Kamala voter, chauvanist, thinks 5 time iraq vet and blackwater merc is cool.

If it quacks…

His plethora of “bad takes” are the direct result of him having a unprincipled chauvinistic views of the world because he would rather watch Disney movies than learn about Palestine.

If he’s not a liberal what is he?

Smh

“its clearly personal because you remember so much about me while i do not know you at all”

“brought up random shit that happened months ago, put words in my mouth, took my comments out of context”

This is contradicting. I didn’t “remember” anything I went and found our dms that you initiated so I could accurately recount the context and what was said verbatim. The complete opposite of putting words of putting words in your mouth.

Not only that but you’ve been the only one to make personal judgements here. And outright lied about our interaction on reddit.

"its not an ”ig model” its a daniela from katseye… i explained this to u the first time u accused me of having a ”thirst trap” as a profile photo. why are you so worked up over my fucking daniela profile pic? why is a woman existing considered a thirst trap to you? "

You never explained who your PFP was that’s a fabrication.

Made it personal by saying I have a “problem with women just existing” which falls apart upon examining the context. Yet I’m somehow the the one leaving context out. I have no issue with that woman or the photo.

“bringing up random shit from month ago”. Aren’t you doing the same by mentioning that i called it a “thirst trap” devoid of any context.

In all of my replies I’ve at least put in some effort instead of just saying what sounds best.

Infact i quoted myself in full calling you a “freak” which i easily could’ve ommitted. I’ve been good faith in representing what happened accurately even when it made me look bad.

Fine I’m wrong, sexist and reactionary, but at least I’m honest.

-less liberals/irrelavant topics, plus many are here because they were banned from reddit for being to based.

-in other thread of yours

But to add

Nothing wrong with it in and of itself, I just thought it was strange in conjunction when a freshly created reddit account with 8k karma 400 contributions, was saying liberal stuff, about russia, while having a soviet hat in there pfp. Already having a personal brand so to speak. Its generally only informative, long time users that have decent pfp especially on reddit. It seemed inorganic / exactly what feds would do if they were running an account.

Was due to the totality of the circumstances

Am I reading it right that the reason given was I was fedposting?

Thanks tho

Idk I’m just trying to be thorough and transparent. As I’m toeing a fine line.

I typed a response to theyre implicit accusation of me being an incel but my phone restarted before i posted it. Maybe I’ll re type it. But for brevities sake I referred to it in that way presuming that they’re fed. As in if the feds were to make a profile why wouldn’t they use a “thirst trap” as the PFP, and slap on a Soviet hat on to call it a day. Honeypot esque. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with referring to it that way. If I had a brad pit PFP and someone referred to it that way that would be fair. They’re profile just stuck out to me as “hello fellow kids” like.

Plus its frustrating that were getting hung up on one word I used, missing the forest for the trees. Only serves to derail the conversation.

However ill push back on me being “hyperdefensive”. Im trying to be as transparent as possible because I feel it would be worse to make this admittedly inflammatory post/comment but just leave it that. I’m just trying to air out my motivations so it doesn’t have presumed. I understand it makes me look worse and hyperdefensive but Id prefer that than the contrary.

And no I wasnt "misinterpreting their post as “everyone that uses the term goy is a reactionary”

In my other comment: “The phrasing of your low effort post is… poor. I think it would be better to have asked if using the term is reactionary in the first place. Instead of conflating it with reactionaries from the beginning.”

Idk… I really just want to see more principled discussions and was annoyed with the replies more so than the post itself. I prefer to lurk, reading more informed opinions than my own. I’ll go back to lurking after this lol.

I was disappointed to see confident yet lazy statements, and presumptuous personal attacks that im a sexist or reactionary and that’s its self evident thereby uskng thst to discredit anything else I said

Its not “drama” from the past I was trying to establish a track record of them holding ignorant opinions and behaving fed like. The first interaction I had I said:

“Bot detected. 25 day old account 8 karma, 400 contributions, pfp is some thirst trap with a poorly edited ussr (hat) on top. Or just dome freak (as opposed to a bot) regardless whyre you posting so much if you don’t know what you’re talking about.” In response to them saying

“They also use North Korean soldiers. I feel very sad for those poor souls despite them being technically on the enemy side, they are mostly clueless”

On shitliberalssay

Shouldn’t have called them a freak, idrk what I meant tho it was awhile ago. I guess It just gave weird parasocial gooner adolescent vibes cuz it was reddit after all. And with that PFP I called them a freak, as I think many people would, quite the contrary to me being an incel. It felt like they were incel like themselves. But I apologize for saying that based off assumptions I made.

I’m from a pro NATO state

So am I,

disingenuous to paint me as a fed simply because i had stupid beliefs when i was on that subreddit for merely WEEKS.

Idek what subreddit your talking about. That’s not what I took issue with. It was a matter of lack of due diligence, the way things were stated, “I’m just asking questions” and honest to God your profile pic lmao. Personally, if I have low confidence in my beliefs I just lurk, or preface them with something explicitly demonstrating so.

Maybe it was wrong for me to hastily paint you as such. Which I admitted. I was just floating the idea. Mostly for other people to scrutinize posts on here more, and how they interact with them. Your posts are self admittedly vague and inflammatory after all.

I view this platform as of higher quality than reddit. When I saw your post I was surprised with how people responded. What I’ve done is more inflammatory than what you did. But… that’s just how I’m able to prompt a more in depth discussion on the matter. For example on your post someone said it was fascist, I asked how, they replied with a guardian article from 2017 that just loosely talked about 4chan, irony poisoning, and “fascism” while using the term very loosely without defining it. Nowhere was goy mentioned, or how its fascist. They didn’t care to elaborate as it turned out.

I guess I’m tired of people making statements without corroborating them. Especially on this matter when its tone policing ostensibly anti zionist language used by the general public which I see as good.

Anyways, I actually like most of your comment’s in general. After this post I won’t have a vendetta or anything against you. I was lashing out because I was annoyed with how the community was responding to your post, not you personally.

PS

How does moderation work on here, why was my comment removed.

I was speaking more broadley. I agree you weren’t tone policing, should’ve made that more clear. Your post was only only part of what prompted my post.

Removed by mod

an*

You’re not gone a like this https://lemmygrad.ml/post/11776633

Goy isn’t even mentioned in the article. If youre ignorant or too lazy to make a coherent argument maybe refrain from saying the first thing that comes to mind.

By the same token black people shouldn’t be able to use the n word.

Why can’t the out group use the word that the in group uses derogatorily towards the out group?

Any “fascism” being spread by the use of the term goy is eclipsed by fascism of liberal Zionists who would rather tone policy anti Zionists than offend the perpetrators of the current genocide. Antisemitism is a nonexistent bogeyman that poses no unique threat.

The real answer to OPs question (ignoring the reactionaries part) is because its humorous unserious ragebait. And a litmus test for where someones priorities are based off the reaction they get.

Op openly being vague and inflammatory to the community 😍 “hey, i just logged on to post the vaguely inflammatory open ended question for the day…” -op

I remember op dmed me months ago on reddit asking why I called op a bot. Months later op still acts in the same way. Posing unprincipled, admittedly vague and inflammatory questions and making overconfident ignorant statements.

Ops DM: "I post so much to learn so I don’t see how that is so weird.

If op wants to learn its not by posting vague and inflammatory questions.

I called it then and I’ll still stand by calling op a bot. Not because you necessarily are one, but you know what I mean…No need to speculate if you’re truly a fed/bot ect. But if you’re not you should do better.

I clocked your profile as suspicious the first time I saw your profile pic.

Agent 1: " hey what kinda profile pic should I use" Agent 2: " what about a IG model and Photoshop a soviet hat on" Agent 1: “good enough that ought to work”

Mostly kidding but cmon

Edit: Classic downvote but no reply technique lol.

How is it fascist

Dawg are we for real. If goy is reactionary how’re we using “idiot” 😂
“Im fine with ableism but I draw the line at lazily making fun of a genocidal state”

SMH

Good goy

Edit: Would love to hear the rational behind normalizing ableist language while condemning the use of “goy” Instead of just downvoting 😂

I don’t personally have a problem with either term. I have a problem when people are hypocritical.

The premise that its reactionary in and of itself needs to be established. Is it used by reactionaries? Sure. But I don’t think its used in a reactionary way.

To partly answer your question of its surge in use;

“Goys” are used by practicing Jews to to perform tasks that they are prohibited from doing during Sabbath. Like cooking etc. Effectively exploiting a loophole in the religion. Goys are effectively viewed as slaves/cattle etc by many sects. Part of the use is used to poke fun of the ridiculousness of this effective loophole. Which I take no issue with. Just as I think it’s funny when people joke about the Amish using sophisticated pneumatics etc. Or “soaking” in regards to mormons.

“Reactionaries” might say “good goy” in response to someone supporting Israel in one way or another.

Its not dissimilar than the use of gusano, craker, or the n word by black people.

The phrasing of your low effort post is… poor. I think it would be better to have asked if using the term is reactionary in the first place. Instead of conflating it with reactionaries from the beginning.

I imagine no one has an issue with people using Jesus as an explicative. (Not that that’s a good comparison but I think the premise can be understood)

I see no problem with it to be honest. I’m open to hearing how I’m wrong but I think people just play it safe and assume its a slur/reactionary and it shouldn’t be used. Cuz it seems like it based off vibes.

Us goys have been well conditioned lol.

Jewish exceptionalism

Haha.

Talking about eating habits how do you manage having your cake and eating it too?

Your opinion is transparent regardless if you explicitly stated it or not. If you actually cared about having a “productive converstion” about it you would’ve gone about it differently. E.g. “that argument seems quite extreme and from my view is a hasty false equivalency” could suffice. Pretending to care about having a “productive conversation” yet immediately becoming provocative and inflammatory. Nice work!

Anddd

Being reactionary upon hearing someone else’s opinion that didn’t involve you when nothing was “imposed” upon you. While simultaneously claiming you don’t care about what other people believe or do. You imposed yourself into this thread.

You clearly do care what other people believe and think of you.

So what will it be? Having? Or eating?

Will you unimpose yourself fron this thread? Or will you be the bigger man and try and have a “productive conversation” presumably by ignoring my reciprocal provocations.