Not to mention how voice assistants can just mishear you. Told google once to put dental floss on my shopping list and it said “got it, I added applesauce.” Good try I guess. Pretty trivial this time, but they expect me to trust that for tasks with financial stakes?
So glad I’m not the only one
That’s what the debating and voting is for, no?
#2: what kind of video games? PvP shooters? Grand strategy? Reflex? Detective games? Story/adventure games? Minesweeper? What about non-grid-based trivia/vocabulary games, or open-ended word games without clues, like Scrabble?
The study says they randomized a subset of the available cognitive games for each game session, could the decreased performance be due to the more sporadic focus on any given skills? Maybe some of the trained skills weren’t especially helpful for memory.
Or maybe the specific cognitive games they used were just bad? The only detail about them in the study was that they “included memory tasks, matching tasks, spatial recognition tasks, and processing speed tasks.” I don’t know if it’s similar stuff, or how fast they let the game difficulty scale in the study, but I’ve tried a couple of those brain trainer apps. They started out trivial and boring and scaled up slowly, and some of them were basically just brute force puzzles. Not particularly mentally strenuous.
I don’t see a control group who did neither of them, either. So are both crosswords and cognitive games good but crosswords are a little better? Or do these cognitive games give just as much benefit as watching Family Guy?
I’m tired of these very specific studies being wildly extrapolated out as “video games bad.” Video games are an extremely diverse medium, it’s like saying reading is bad because you only studied gas station tabloids.
Just from a logistical perspective, holiday cooking in an unfamiliar kitchen sounds like an absolute nightmare, especially with Airbnb where you’re at the mercy of the host for how well equipped it’ll be.
What happened to his hands?
Linen actually doesn’t take to large scale mechanization very well. It causes the fibers to break into shorter pieces more often, which makes the final fabric rougher and less sturdy. Machine-woven linen also tends to be more loosely woven, which is again less sturdy.
Machines certainly helped some amount, but cotton got a way bigger boost from industrialization. That’s why cotton is so much cheaper than linen today, especially high quality linen.
My understanding was that there are three types of rayon. Or have I been had by Big Cellulose?
If something just says “Rayon” you can probably assume it’s viscose. Tencel sellers want you to know it’s Tencel.
Regardless, none of the above are good for warmth, so bad replacement for wool no matter which process they use. I do love my Tencel bedsheets though.
Dude, my boss every time. I don’t even know how I can go shorter because one time, the whole email was the 2 questions, 21 words total. Still ignored one of them.
That feel when your Etsy purchase comes with an Amazon receipt in the package :(
It is the words “toilet paper” repeated over and over to whatever tune comes to mind
I always have to sing the toilet paper song through the whole process
You would think so wouldn’t you? But Google usually still tries to be “helpful” about everything. “100 linen” does work better, although still not perfect.
That also doesn’t fix the issue with being unable to ignore Amazon and Walmart. On the standard search, the dash to ban a specific term makes it not the first result but it still shows up further down the page. On the dedicated product search it doesn’t seem to do anything at all.
Here’s an example of how well search operators do these days.
I just signed up for the free trial of Kagi, I’ll have to see how it compares.
It’s even bad for finding something to purchase honestly. I’ll search for a specific part number, and most of the results are other similar but not interchangeable products. No Google I cannot just shove this random other battery pack into my UPS, but thanks anyway.
I tried searching for airtight drawers and all the results were either airtight or drawers. Only one was both and it was a ten thousand dollar museum specimen cabinet.
It’s especially terrible if you care about the fiber content of your clothes. Searching for linen or even 100% linen gets me linen blend, linen-look, linen color. 100% wool gets mostly acrylic wool blends. Wool toe socks gets me either wool socks or toe socks but again, not both.
Plus I can’t block Amazon and Walmart from the results anymore, so that’s a ton of extra junk to filter through manually.
Man I can haul 3 2x4s in my Camry
There’s !darkbrandon@lemmy.world
Edit - how do I link it
I was not expecting that title to be so literal
I keep seeing articles refer to them as “a university” or “Prager University” lately, what’s up with that? I thought they were officially PragerU because as a media outlet they’re not allowed to call themselves a university, but the U implies it enough to lend credibility.
Are these writers just taking the bait? Or did PragerU finally realize you don’t have to follow the law if you’re rich and conservative?
Good call, I even turned off my ad blocker for this one.