Stamets@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 1 year agoThe dreamlemmy.worldimagemessage-square208fedilinkarrow-up11.97Karrow-down142
arrow-up11.93Karrow-down1imageThe dreamlemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 1 year agomessage-square208fedilink
minus-squareschmidtster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·1 year agoShouldn’t there be a catch all term to explain the broader scope of the specifics? Science is a broad term for multiple different studies, vehicle is a broad term for cars and trucks.
minus-squareschmidtster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·1 year agoIs that not a type of AI already?
minus-squareTheGreenGolem@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoGlorified chatbots. Tops. But definitely not something with any kind of intelligence.
minus-squareParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 year agoYesterday I prompted gpt4 to convert a power shell script to Haskell. It did it in one shot. This happens more and more frequently for me. I don’t want to oversell llms, but you are definitely underselling them.
minus-squareschmidtster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoSo people think of programming instead?
Shouldn’t there be a catch all term to explain the broader scope of the specifics?
Science is a broad term for multiple different studies, vehicle is a broad term for cars and trucks.
Machine learning?
Is that not a type of AI already?
Glorified chatbots. Tops. But definitely not something with any kind of intelligence.
Yesterday I prompted gpt4 to convert a power shell script to Haskell. It did it in one shot. This happens more and more frequently for me.
I don’t want to oversell llms, but you are definitely underselling them.
“Computer Science”
So people think of programming instead?