return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 2 years agoReturn to office is ‘dead,’ Stanford economist says. Here’s whywww.cnbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square49linkfedilinkarrow-up1347arrow-down111cross-posted to: futurology@futurology.todaytechnology@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1336arrow-down1external-linkReturn to office is ‘dead,’ Stanford economist says. Here’s whywww.cnbc.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square49linkfedilinkcross-posted to: futurology@futurology.todaytechnology@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
minus-squareKecessa@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-22 years agoThat’s what I meant, why should we need to go to court to get that right recognized when it should be the government changing the law without court intervention?
That’s what I meant, why should we need to go to court to get that right recognized when it should be the government changing the law without court intervention?