Stamets@startrek.website to tumblr@lemmy.world · 2 years agoTrue to formstartrek.websiteimagemessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up1843arrow-down129
arrow-up1814arrow-down1imageTrue to formstartrek.websiteStamets@startrek.website to tumblr@lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square77fedilink
minus-squareLifter@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 years agoExcept for the metre-system, which is objective more correct
minus-squareJake Farm@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·2 years agoIts more base 10. Arguably, the babylonian base 60 system would be more useful for measurement.
minus-squareLifter@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoUsing the same base for regular numbers and for measurements is the most useful, no? We happen to use base 10. That’s going to be hard to change, but sure, it would have been better to choose a more divisable number, maybe 12.
Except for the metre-system, which is objective more correct
Its more base 10. Arguably, the babylonian base 60 system would be more useful for measurement.
Using the same base for regular numbers and for measurements is the most useful, no? We happen to use base 10. That’s going to be hard to change, but sure, it would have been better to choose a more divisable number, maybe 12.