LLMs are far more training data-intensive, hardware-intensive, and energy-intensive than a human brain. They’re still very much a brute-force method of getting computers to work with language.
What if I read the book aloud into a speech to text program? That’s an algorithm consuming data and producing a result, with a human doing the reading.
Because reading is an inherently human activity.
An LLM consuming data from a training model is not.
LLMs forcing us to take a look at ourselves and see if we’re really that special.
I don’t think we are.
For now, we’re special.
LLMs are far more training data-intensive, hardware-intensive, and energy-intensive than a human brain. They’re still very much a brute-force method of getting computers to work with language.
Is there a legal differential, here?
What if I read the book aloud into a speech to text program? That’s an algorithm consuming data and producing a result, with a human doing the reading.