smitten@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Math Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 years ago95.121% accuracyi.imgur.comimagemessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up1121arrow-down10cross-posted to: science_memes@mander.xyz
arrow-up1121arrow-down1image95.121% accuracyi.imgur.comsmitten@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Math Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square13fedilinkcross-posted to: science_memes@mander.xyz
minus-squareCevilia (she/they/…)@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·2 years agoIt would be very easy to increase that to 100%, if you’re prepared to ignore enough data…
minus-squaresmitten@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 years agoActually it would approach 100% without ignoring data wouldn’t it?
minus-squareCevilia (she/they/…)@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoBut the only way it would actually get there depends on you, and your willingness to ignore data. :)
It would be very easy to increase that to 100%, if you’re prepared to ignore enough data…
Actually it would approach 100% without ignoring data wouldn’t it?
But the only way it would actually get there depends on you, and your willingness to ignore data. :)