m_f@discuss.onlineM to Cyanide & Happiness@discuss.onlineEnglish · 4 days ago2012-11-06discuss.onlineimagemessage-square48linkfedilinkarrow-up1557arrow-down17file-text
arrow-up1550arrow-down1image2012-11-06discuss.onlinem_f@discuss.onlineM to Cyanide & Happiness@discuss.onlineEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square48linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarenilloc@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 days agoRobots that scan ballots don’t give a shit about your scribbles and will just not count the vote. Then you’re back to accelerationist nonsense
minus-squaredukeofdummies@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 days agoDefaced ballots are counted. Not towards any party but they are recorded. I’m not saying it’s a silver stake, I’m just saying it clears the ever low bar of being better than “not voting at all”
minus-squareNotAnOtter@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoIf 10% of people defaced their ballot this would be a international scandal. The ‘champions of democracy’ have at-scale revolt in their democratic process. Think J6 but worse in terms of recognition. We are still talking about J6
Robots that scan ballots don’t give a shit about your scribbles and will just not count the vote.
Then you’re back to accelerationist nonsense
Defaced ballots are counted. Not towards any party but they are recorded.
I’m not saying it’s a silver stake, I’m just saying it clears the ever low bar of being better than “not voting at all”
If 10% of people defaced their ballot this would be a international scandal. The ‘champions of democracy’ have at-scale revolt in their democratic process.
Think J6 but worse in terms of recognition. We are still talking about J6